Pre-emptive Right in Joint Stock Companies
Introduction
In the case of a capital increase made from internal resources in joint stock companies, current shareholders acquire ipso facto the gratis shares in accordance with the ratio of their current shares to the company’s share capital. As to the capital increase through capital subscription from external resources, each shareholder is entitled to acquire new shares in accordance with the ratio of his/her current shares to the company’s share capital. The objective of a pre-emptive right is to preserve the shareholder’s shareholding ratio in the company[1]. Notwithstanding this principle, this right may be exceptionally restricted or removed. In this Newsletter, the nature of pre-emptive right, rules and procedures governing its exercise, and the motives for its removal or restriction, will be discussed in light of the decisions of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court and the Turkish Court of Appeals, and the pre-emptive right will be analysed within the context of the registered capital system.
The Pre-emptive Right and Its Utilization
Article 461 of the Turkish Commercial Code numbered 6102[2] (TCC) regulates the pre-emptive right in joint stock companies, as well as the principles regarding its exercise. Accordingly, a pre-emptive right is the right held by each shareholder to acquire new shares issued by the company in accordance with the ratio of his/her current shares to the company’s share capital. The preamble of the article[3] clearly states that the nominal value of the shares shall be taken as a basis for the determination of the right to acquire new shares.
Pursuant to Article 461/3 of the TCC, the board of directors shall designate the principles governing the exercise of the right to acquire new shares by a resolution, and grant a period of at least fifteen days to shareholders. The registration and announcement of such resolution is mandatory. The objective of this regulation is not only to determine the period of fifteen days, but at the same time to instruct the board of directors in this regard[4]. As the Article specifies such fifteen-day period as a minimum, the granting of a fifteen-day period does not always mean that the board of directors has fulfilled its duty in accordance with the law, as the board of directors is also responsible for providing a term that is sufficient for the exercise of the pre-emptive right[5]. The date specified under the resolution for the exercise of the pre-emptive right cannot be a date prior to the announcement of the resolution[6].
Article 497 of the TCC also emphasizes that the shareholders are entitled to a pre-emptive right without any restrictions. According to this Article, in the transfer of listed registered shares, the transferee cannot exercise its rights to participate and vote in the general assembly meeting arising from its shares and other rights attached to the voting right, until the company recognizes the transfer; whereas, it is not subject to any restrictions for the exercise of the other shareholding rights, especially the pre-emptive right.
The fourth paragraph of Article 461 of the TCC explicitly allows the transfer of the pre-emptive right.
Main Principles Concerning the Pre-emptive Right
The preamble of Article 461/2 of the TCC[7] states that the Article specifies four principles strengthening the right to acquire new shares and, consequently, protecting the shareholders, and lists such principles, as follows:
“(i) The pre-emptive right cannot be restricted nor removed by the articles of association. The approach of the new system is that this right shall not be removed and not even restricted, and this path shall be only followed on exception. In the event of the application of this exception, the general assembly shall resolve according to the current case. A generic clause to be included under the articles of association enabling the removal or the restriction of this right would contradict this principal approach.
(ii) This right may be restricted or removed only upon the existence of just causes…
(iii) Another strong protective provision is laid down under the third sentence of the second paragraph. Removal or restriction of the right to acquire new shares cannot be made for the purposes of some persons profiting (in an unjust manner), whether or not shareholders, and causing damages to some of the shareholders. The provision in question aims to avoid intragroup structural changes to the detriment of some shareholders and dilution of their shareholding ratios. This provision also expressly emphasizes the principles of equal treatment, exercise of rights in a limited way, and limitation of majority power with just causes.
(iv) Qualified quorum constitutes a minority right due to its preventive nature.”
The just causes mentioned under the above principles and the qualified quorum are analysed under the following sections.
The Restriction or Removal of the Pre-emptive Right
Notwithstanding the main principle intended not to restrict or remove the pre-emptive right, the laws allows such in certain circumstances: (i) meeting the qualified quorum at the relevant general assembly meeting and (ii) existence of just cause for the restriction or removal. Even if these conditions are met, no one can take advantage of the restriction or removal of the pre-emptive right, or incur losses in an unjustified way. Moreover, the board of directors is required to declare the grounds of the restriction or removal of the pre-emptive right through a report. The registration and announcement of such report is mandatory.
General Assembly Quorum
For the restriction or removal of the pre-emptive right of shareholders by the general assembly resolution related to a capital increase, the affirmative votes of at least 60% of the share capital is required. This percentage cannot be decreased by the articles of association.
Just Cause
The pre-emptive right cannot be restricted or removed without just cause. Article 416/2 of the TCC specifies such just causes by way of illustration, in a non numerus clausus manner. These causes mentioned under the law are public offering, acquisition of enterprises, parts of enterprises and subsidiaries, as well as participation of the employees in the company.
As it is stated in the preamble of the Article, these examples listed under the Article do not necessitate the determination of the just causes within the framework of these examples. Causes such as company’s financial interests, recovery from repayment difficulty, and the purchase of technology are also just causes.
Within the context of restriction or removal of the pre-emptive right, the equal treatment principle often becomes an issue. According to a decision of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court dated 1992[8], a pre-emptive right granted to the shareholders in the event of a capital increase shall be used in accordance with the principle of equal treatment. The general assembly is entitled to restrict this right only with an objective justification and, if it is necessary, for the legitimate interests of the company, for example, in the event of capital increase for the purposes of adding new shareholders to the company, or expanding the environment of investors.
A decision of the Court in 1966 sets forth essential principles related to the pre-emptive right[9]. In this case, the share capital of the company has been increased, and the general assembly has resolved that shareholders, other than those who were members of the board of directors, or employees of the company could not exercise their pre-emptive rights. The objective was to decrease the participation of some shareholders to the company’s profit, as they were competing with the company through working within the company’s area of business. The Court resolved that the restriction of the pre-emptive right would be valid only if it had an indispensable and significant motive related to the company’s progress and continuity; otherwise, it would be rendered invalid due to the violation of the principle of equal treatment. The decision states that the restriction of the pre-emptive right in the specific case caused significant material damages to the shareholders whose rights were restricted and impaired their right to vote, that there were no valid grounds for this resolution, which was in violation of the principle of equal treatment, and that the intention of protecting the company against competition could not be a valid reason for this inequality.
In a case subject to the decision of the Turkish Court of Appeals in 1997[10], the share capital of the company has been increased, and all of the increased capital has been covered from the debts of the company to one of the shareholders. The Court resolved that even if this is for the payment of the debt, allowing only such shareholder to exercise its pre-emptive right prevented other shareholders to participate in the capital increase and, therefore, violated the principle of equality.
Evaluation of the Restriction within the Scope of Share Transfer Limitations
According to Article 461/5 of the TCC, the company cannot prevent the shareholders from exercising their pre-emptive rights on the grounds that the transfer of registered shares is limited by the articles of association. With this rule, when the company’s interests in limiting the share transfers contradict the shareholders’ interests in acquiring new shares, the lawmaker prefers the pre-emptive right[11]. On the other hand, the wording of the Article reading as “shareholders that the company granted pre-emptive right” concludes that this preference only protects shareholders’ pre-emptive rights, and that those who are not shareholders, but who only exercise the pre-emptive right that they acquired, cannot benefit from such preference[12].
Pre-Emptive Right in the Registered Capital System
Article 461/2 of the TCC states that except for the condition relating to the general assembly quorum, provisions regarding the restriction or removal of the pre-emptive right shall also apply to the board of directors’ capital increase decision in the registered capital system.
This issue is also regulated under the Communiqué on the Principles Related to the Registered Capital System in Non-Public Companies[13] (“Communiqué”). According to Article 9 of the Communiqué, during the capital increase, for the restriction of the shareholders’ pre-emptive rights for new shares through the decision of the board of directors, the board of directors must have been authorized in this regard by the articles of association. The board of directors’ authority to restrict the pre-emptive right cannot be used so as to create inequality between the shareholders. It is also regulated under Article 9 of the Communiqué that in the event of the authorization of the board of directors to restrict a pre-emptive right by the articles of association, a declaration setting forth the justifications of this authorization shall also be submitted in the permission application of the companies willing to apply the registered capital system. This provision intends that the Ministry of Customs and Trade examine the justifications of the board of directors’ authorization to restrict the pre-emptive right, and acts as an auditing authority.
Conclusion
In the capital increases of joint stock companies through capital subscription, the TCC grants each shareholder the right to acquire new shares in accordance with the ratio of his/her current shares to the company’s share capital. This right has been regulated with clearer provisions compared to the abrogated Turkish Commercial Code numbered 6762[14], and new rules have been introduced. Restriction or removal of the pre-emptive right by the general assembly is only possible with the affirmative votes of at least 60% of the share capital, and provided that just cause exists. Reasons such as public offering, acquisition of enterprises, parts of enterprises and subsidiaries, participation of the employees in the company, as well as the company’s financial interests, recovery from repayment difficulty, and purchase of technology shall be also considered valid; however, in any event, an evaluation shall be made taking into consideration the conditions of each specific case.
[1] Ünal Tekinalp, Sermaye Ortaklıklarının Yeni Hukuku, Değişiklikler ve İkincil Düzenlemelerle Güncelleştirilmiş 3. Bası, İstanbul 2013, p. 306.
[2] Official Gazette February 14, 2011, No. 27846. It has entered into force on July 1, 2012.
[3] Preamble of Article 461 of the TCC.
[4] Preamble of Article 461 of the TCC.
[5] Preamble of Article 461 of the TCC.
[6] Tekinalp, p. 309.
[7] Preamble of Article 461 of the TCC.
[8] ATF 117 II 290 – JDT 1992 I 318-320; H. Ercüment Erdem, “Türk ve İsviçre Hukuklarında Eşit İşlem İlkesi”, İsviçre Borçlar Kanunu’nun İktibasının 80. Yılında İsviçre Borçlar Hukuku’nun Türk Ticaret Hukuku’na Etkileri, İstanbul 2009, p. 413.
[9] JDT 1966 I 264-277; Erdem, p. 413.
[10] Court of Appeals 11th Civil Chamber, E. (File Number) 1997/5583, K. (Decision Number) 1997/6609, dated 06.10.1997 (www.kazanci.com).
[11] Preamble of Article 461 of the TCC.
[12] Preamble of Article 461 of the TCC.
[13] Official Gazette October 19, 2012, No. 28446. It has entered into force on the date of its publication.
[14] Turkish Commercial Code numbered 6762 (Official Gazette July 9, 1956, No. 9353) has been abolished through the entrance into force of the TCC.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The Turkish automobile and light commercial vehicle market left the 2000s behind with steadily rising sales figures and the 2010s with high and stable sales figures as well. In this period, the growth of the market was driven not only by high purchase power but also by easy access to credit and product diversity...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") provides the right to exit from the company to the shareholders of limited liability companies and the right to squeeze out the shareholder from the company, unlike the structure of joint stock companies, with the exit and squeeze out institutions specially regulated for...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”) preserves the rule that the board of directors shall manage and represent joint stock companies. The TCC regulates how the power of representation shall be exercised, the registration and announcement of the persons authorized to represent, the transfer of the...
Ordinary partnerships are regulated under Turkish Law between Articles 620 and 645 of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO” or the “Code”). The Law defines an ordinary partnership contract as a contract where two or more persons undertake to combine their labour or property to achieve a common...
Merger and acquisition processes are one of the legal processes that most seriously affect the identities and legal status of companies. After the completion of legal, tax, financial and operational due diligence reports, the parties initiate the negotiation process in case they reach an agreement on proceeding with the...
A popular business model for expanding market reach and brand recognition worldwide is franchising. Despite being less common than distribution agreements in the form of mono-brand store agreements, franchising is another significant method for extending luxury brands' distribution networks. Luxury brands use...
In the decision dated 14.06.2022 and numbered 2019/149 E. 2022/894 K., the Court of Cassation General Assembly (“CCGA”) evaluated the theory of piercing the corporate veil in the context of the relationship between the guarantor and the borrowing company in a dispute arising from a loan agreement...
The European Union continues to be an important investment center for foreign investors. According to data from the European Commission's "Second Annual Report on the monitoring of foreign direct investment in the European Union", the European Union received €117 billion worth of foreign direct investment in...
Transfer of shares is arguably the first legal transaction that comes to mind among the legal transactions regarding the shares of a capital company, and the most common transaction in practice. However, the shares of a capital company may also be subject to various transactions, other than share purchase...
Law No. 6563 on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce (E-commerce Law or Law) has recently undergone a radical change in order to regulate the behavior of the players in the rapidly growing and developing e-commerce sector. The new regulations that came into force as of January 1, 2023 envisage important...
On 11 June 2021, the German Federal Parliament approved the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltsgesetz) (“Act”) which affects not only German entities but also their suppliers in foreign countries (including Turkish entities). The main focus of the Act, which entered into force on...
On 21 December 2007, the Federal Council approved the draft revision of the Swiss Code of Obligations, which also includes amendments to company law. On 28 November 2014, the Federal Council referred the draft revision for consultation. Following extensive discussions and a long enactment process, the...
The Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") regulates maritime trade contracts under the fourth part of the fifth book of the Code. Among the types of contracts regulated in this section, the most frequently used contract in international maritime transport practice is the freight contract regulated under...
Prohibition on hidden income shifting is one of the most important issues that is broadly regulated under Capital Markets Law No. 6362 (“CML”). In conjunction with CML Article 21, which has a broader context than Article 15 of the abrogated Capital Markets Law No. 2499, another significant step has been taken...
As a result of developing commercial activities and large-scale investments, especially concluded in the fields of construction, energy and mining, companies are seeking to participate in these investments by uniting their powers and expertise to take advantage of financial opportunities together. This tendency...
The Turkish Commercial Code (“TCC” or “Law”) has enabled companies to apply different structural models and to implement new legal formations by including spin-off provisions to its Article 159 et seq. In accordance with the provisions of the law, companies may transfer a certain element, or elements, of their...
The International Federation of Consulting Engineers is a professional association established in 1913, known as the FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Counseils). Its members are duly elected from consultant-engineer associations of various countries, and membership to the association is...
Incoterms are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of Incoterms rules is to facilitate and expedite international trade in a safe and secure manner...
The regulation applicable to all Turkish ports prepared by the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications that entered into force after being published in the official gazette on October 31, 2012 (˝the Regulation˝), consolidates all the bylaws, regulations and instructions in a single Regulation...
As a rule, rights and obligations arising from an agreement have legal consequences only between the creditor and the debtor which are parties to the agreement. This principle is referred to as "privity of contract." In general, contracts for the benefit of third parties, where the fulfillment of an...
The rules of e-commerce, which grow and develop with the digitalizing world, are changing. E-commerce has become the driving force of the digital economy. However, considering the growth rate of e-commerce and the transformation it has undergone in a short time, it is obvious that some...
The dissolution of a company is a specific type of dissolution, which results in the cancellation of the legal personality which was gained by registration at incorporation. The specific proceeding which leads to the dissolution, and thus, the termination of a company upon the constitutive decision...
Companies in which shares or authority to manage is held by members of a family are considered to be “family businesses”. Family members can hold shares that control the company, as well as retain management authority. Having a family business means opportunity, security and income for...
Turkey ratified the Convention on the Contract for International Carriage of Goods by Road (“CMR”) in accordance with Act No. 3939 dated 7 December 1993, and the CMR entered into force in Turkey on 31 October 1995. In accordance with Article 1 / 1 of the CMR, the carriage of goods by road...
Ordinary partnerships are governed by Article 620 et seq. of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO”). An ordinary partnership agreement is defined as an agreement whereby two or more persons undertake to join efforts and/or goods to reach a common goal...
The concept of disguised profit transfer in joint stock companies, in its broadest meaning, covers the transfer of company assets to related parties and may occur in different ways. This concept is regulated in detail under capital markets legislation...
Share subscription agreements, which are commonly encountered in start-up investments, set out the terms and conditions of an investor’s participation in a company as a shareholder by subscribing the new shares issued in a capital increase...
The electronic signature, which has the same legal consequences as wet signatures if it meets certain conditions, has taken its place in many legal systems and has enhanced commercial life. Although there are various types and applications in different legal systems...
INCOTERMS are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of the Incoterms rules is to contribute to and facilitate the safe and swift conduct of international trade...