Board of Directors Members' Legal Liability: Insights from Court of Cassation Decisions
Introduction
Under Article 365 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC"), each member of the board of directors, which is the body responsible for the administration and representation of a joint stock company, is obliged to fulfill their duties arising from the law and the articles of association within the limits and principles outlined in the law and the articles of association, and otherwise, they may be held liable for the damages caused by their negligence. In this Newsletter article, in light of the decisions of the Court of Cassation, the legal liability of the members of the board of directors is examined in some noteworthy aspects, firstly, the obligations that they are required to fulfill, and then, if they fail to fulfill these obligations, the other conditions sought for their liability to be invoked.
Obligations to be Fulfilled by the Members of the Board of Directors
Article 369 of the TCC stipulates that the members of the board of directors are obliged to perform their duties in the company "with the diligence of a prudent manager" and to protect the interests of the company by the rule of honesty. The expression stating that the members of the board of directors are obliged to perform their duties "with the care of a prudent manager" regulates the duty of diligence, and the expression stating that they are obliged to protect the interests of the company by the rule of honesty regulates the duty of loyalty.
Among these, the duty of care, on the one hand, constitutes an independent obligation that board members are obliged to comply with by law; on the other hand, it also serves as a criterion to determine whether the board members are at fault in the transactions and actions they perform within the scope of their duties. In other words, a member of the board of directors who takes due care in the performance of his/her duties following Article 369 of the TCC not only fulfills an independent obligation arising from the law but also prevents any subsequent attribution of fault to him/her about the acts or transactions he/she has performed in the performance of his/her duties.[1]
At this point, the measure of care to be taken as a basis for the board member to be deemed to have fulfilled his/her duty of care in his/her transactions and actions is important. In the preamble of Article 369 of the TCC, the expression "due diligence of a prudent director" is expressed as "prudent director criterion" and explained as follows "The prudent director measure recognizes that the board member may make a "business judgment rule" in accordance with the corporate governance principles and is based on the principle that the board member shall not be held liable in cases where the risk arises therefrom. Pursuant to the generally accepted rule, if appropriate investigations are made and information is obtained from the relevant persons and a decision is made by the board of directors, even if the developments are completely in the opposite direction and the company suffers a loss, there can be no negligence."[2]
The preamble to Article 369 of the TCC indicates that a member of the board of directors may be deemed to have fulfilled his/her duty of care if he/she has performed a transaction or an action within the limits of his/her duties and powers, in light of and by the reasonable, scientific and concrete data available under the circumstances of the day, and by protecting the interests of the company. Although it is understood that the general understanding stated in the text of the justification should be taken as the basis for the evaluations within this scope, it should be noted that different evaluations may be made according to the characteristics of each concrete case.
As mentioned above, Article 369 of the TCC also regulates the obligation of loyalty of the members of the board of directors. Under Art. 369 of the TCC, it is stated that the members of the board of directors must pursue the interests of the company in their transactions and actions by the rule of honesty, and thus, the general framework of the obligation of loyalty is set forth.
Among the other obligations of the members of the board of directors, the "Prohibition of Participation in Negotiations" regulated under Article 393 of the TCC, the "Prohibition of Transactions with the Company and Borrowing Money from the Company" regulated under Article 395 of the TCC, and the "Prohibition of Competition" regulated under Article 396 of the TCC may be considered as special cases of the obligation of loyalty.
Under the prohibition of participation in the meetings regulated under Article 393 of the TCC, a member shall not participate in the meetings where the matter falling within the scope of the prohibition is to be discussed, in the event of a conflict of interest between his/her personal or non-company interest and the interest of the company, or that of his/her descendants, or that of his/her spouse, or that of one of his/her relatives by blood or by marriage, including the third degree. However, the members who do not object to the attendance of this member at the meeting or take a decision to allow this member to attend the meeting despite the knowledge of a conflict of interest and the member acting in violation of this prohibition may be held liable to indemnify the damages incurred by the company due to this reason.
Under the prohibition of transacting with the company, which is another aspect of the obligation of loyalty, the members of the board of directors may not transact with the company on their behalf or behalf of others without obtaining permission from the general assembly. It is possible to abolish the prohibition to conduct transactions with the company by a provision to be included in the articles of association of the company, and this respect, it is possible to eliminate this prohibition not with the authorization that may be granted by the general assembly in each concrete case, but in a manner to be valid for all members and in all cases.[3] In addition, pursuant to Article 395/2 of the TCC, non-shareholder members and their non-shareholder relatives are prohibited from borrowing cash from the company, and within this framework, it is not possible for the company to provide surety, guarantee or collateral for such persons or to take over the debts of such persons. Within the framework of the prohibition of competition regulated under Article 396 of the TCC, it is stipulated that the members of the board of directors may not, without obtaining the authorization of the general assembly, engage in a commercial business that falls within the company's field of activity on their own behalf or on behalf of others, and/or may not enter into a company engaged in the same type of commercial business as a partner with limited liability.
Although not directly regulated under the TCC, the members of the board of directors are also subject to the confidentiality obligation as a special aspect of the obligation of loyalty. It is understood that the members of the board of directors are subject to the confidentiality obligation, within the limits of the law and the articles of association, considering the powers they have in terms of the execution and representation of the company and their ability to obtain the widest range of information about the company within this scope.
In addition, under Article 357 of the TCC, the members of the board of directors are obliged to observe the principle of equal treatment in all their transactions and actions, and they may be held liable for breach of this principle if all the conditions described in the second part of this Newsletter article are present.
In addition to the ones mentioned above in general terms, other liabilities foreseen for the members of the board of directors under the TCC include special liability arising from the unlawfulness of documents and statements (Art. 549 TCC), misrepresentation of capital and knowledge of insufficient payment (Art. 550 TCC), fraud in valuation (Art. 551 TCC) and collection of money from the public (Art. 552 TCC). In addition to the above-mentioned obligations regulated under the TCC, it is also possible to stipulate additional obligations for the members of the board of directors in the articles of association of the companies, provided that they do not contradict the law.
Conditions for the Legal Liability of the Members of the Board of Directors
Under Article 553/1 of the TCC, if the members of the board of directors violated their obligations arising from the law or the articles of the association through their fault, they shall be liable to the company, shareholders, and creditors of the company for the damages they cause. In this context, it is understood that if all conditions are met, the parties mentioned in the article may file a liability lawsuit against the members of the board of directors.
Article 555 of the TCC stipulates that the company and each shareholder may request compensation for the damages incurred by the company, provided that the compensation is paid to the company. Therefore, the company, the shareholders and the creditors of the company may apply to the liability of the members of the board of directors for the compensation of the damages not suffered by the company, but directly suffered by them (e.g. preventing the shareholder from exercising the pre-emptive right in the capital increase, etc.), and the company and the shareholders may also file a liability action for the compensation of the damages directly suffered by the company. In this context, the contrary[4] of the general rule in Turkish law, which states that a person cannot claim compensation for the damages suffered due to an action that is not directly directed against him/her, is applicable within the framework of Article 555 of the TCC. It should be noted that under Article 556/1 of the TCC, this possibility for the creditors of the company is only available in the event of the bankruptcy of the company. In the case subject to the decision of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 09.06.2016 and numbered 2015/14405 E. 2016/6410K.; the plaintiffs, who are the shareholders of the company, claimed that the members of the board of directors unlawfully granted them a limited period for the payment of the balance of the increased amount within 15 days in the capital increase, some of which was made through cash capital commitment, and that they suffered damages for this reason, and requested compensation for their damages. Although the court of first instance dismissed the lawsuit based on Article 555/1 of the TCC, stating that the plaintiffs could only file a lawsuit for the payment of the amount to be awarded to the company, the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation ruled that the damage, if any, may be like direct damage and should be examined. In another decision of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 25.02.2021 and numbered 2019/2317E. 2021/1708K., it is stated that the company creditors may have damages that are independent of the company's damages, and in this case, it does not matter whether the company is damaged or not, and in this type of lawsuit, the creditors may demand that the compensation be paid to them.
To bring a liability action against the members of the board of directors, the existence of an unlawful act, fault, damage and causal link are sought within the framework of the general principles of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098. First of all, we would like to state that our explanations regarding the existence of damage are as above. Article 553/1 of the TCC, on the other hand, regulates that another condition required for the liability to arise is fault, and that for the liability of the members of the board of directors to arise, they must have breached the obligation to which they are subject through their fault. In this context, the liability regime for the members of the board of directors is fault liability, and the party who submits the lawsuit is obliged to prove the fault of the member of the board of directors. In the case subject to the decision of the 23rd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 06.02.2019 and numbered 2016/2905E. 2019/310K. although the plaintiff filed a liability lawsuit against the members of the board of directors, claiming that the defendant board members were at fault in the failure to submit the tax returns, he could not prove that the board members were at fault. The 23rd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation reversed the decision of the Court of First Instance for the acceptance of the lawsuit, stating that, based on the expressions in the first version of Article 553/1 of the TCC, it was understood that the members of the board of directors were obliged to prove that they were not at fault, but based on the current version of the article, the fault of the members ceased to be a presumption and it was regulated that the members would not be liable as long as the plaintiff proved that they were at fault.
For a liability action to be brought, an unlawful transaction or act and the existence of a causal link between this transaction or act and the damage are also required. In this respect, if the members of the board of directors violate their obligations outlined in the first section of this Newsletter article through their negligence and as a result, damage arises, they may be liable for the compensation of this damage.
On the other hand, Article 557 of the TCC stipulates that if more than one member of the board of directors is liable to compensate for the same damage, each of them shall be jointly and severally liable for the compensation of the damage, to the extent of the fault attributable to him/her, and together with the other members of the board of directors to whom fault can be attributed in the same manner, according to his/her fault and the requirements of the situation. In this respect, it is understood that the principle of differentiated succession applies to the liability of the members of the board of directors.[5]
Conclusion
Finally, under Article 560 of the TCC, the right to claim compensation for damages from the responsible parties is 2 years from the date of the plaintiff's learning of the damage and the responsible party, and in any case 5 years from the date of the occurrence of the act giving rise to the damage. If there is a release decision regarding the relevant transaction of the members of the board of directors, it is necessary to make a separate evaluation in this context, and the issue of release is not addressed in this Newsletter article.
- Poroy, Reha/Tekinalp, Ünal/Çamoğlu, Ersin: Partnerships Law I, Vedat Kitapçılık, Istanbul 2021, p. 420
- Reason for Article 369 of the TCC
- Poroy, Reha/Tekinalp, Ünal/Çamoğlu, Ersin: Partnership Law I, Vedat Kitapçılık, Istanbul 2021, p. 412
- Court of Cassation Case Law Unification Board 06.07.2018 T. 2017/5E. 2018/7K.
- 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation 01.06.2021 T. 2019/4815E. 2021/4664K.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
Law No. 7262 dated 27.12.2020 introduced an obligation to notify the Central Registry Agency (“CRA”) regarding the issuance and transfer of bearer shares under the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”) and stipulates that those who violate the notification requirement under Art. 486/2 of the TCC shall be...
Similar to previous years, in 2024, mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions continue to be shaped by global economic dynamics, geopolitical risks and technological innovations...
The common goal (in the ideal world) of people who become shareholders by participating in the capital of a company or managers by participating in the management body is to manage the company in the best way and to obtain maximum economic benefit...
The most common forms of agency agreements can be categorized under three main headings. These can be listed as an Agency Agreement, Distributorship Agreement, and Franchise Agreement...
Employee shareholding, which means the ownership of some or all of the capital of a publicly traded or closed company by employees, has attracted great interest in many countries around the world, particularly in the United States of America, due to the advantages it provides to the national economy, the...
There are many different rules that newly established companies must consider and comply with when starting their commercial activities. One of these rules is the "Evasion of Law" article regulated under Article 356 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC"). The relevant rule aims to prevent the...
The Turkish automobile and light commercial vehicle market left the 2000s behind with steadily rising sales figures and the 2010s with high and stable sales figures as well. In this period, the growth of the market was driven not only by high purchase power but also by easy access to credit and product diversity...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") provides the right to exit from the company to the shareholders of limited liability companies and the right to squeeze out the shareholder from the company, unlike the structure of joint stock companies, with the exit and squeeze out institutions specially regulated for...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”) preserves the rule that the board of directors shall manage and represent joint stock companies. The TCC regulates how the power of representation shall be exercised, the registration and announcement of the persons authorized to represent, the transfer of the...
Ordinary partnerships are regulated under Turkish Law between Articles 620 and 645 of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO” or the “Code”). The Law defines an ordinary partnership contract as a contract where two or more persons undertake to combine their labour or property to achieve a common...
Merger and acquisition processes are one of the legal processes that most seriously affect the identities and legal status of companies. After the completion of legal, tax, financial and operational due diligence reports, the parties initiate the negotiation process in case they reach an agreement on proceeding with the...
A popular business model for expanding market reach and brand recognition worldwide is franchising. Despite being less common than distribution agreements in the form of mono-brand store agreements, franchising is another significant method for extending luxury brands' distribution networks. Luxury brands use...
In the decision dated 14.06.2022 and numbered 2019/149 E. 2022/894 K., the Court of Cassation General Assembly (“CCGA”) evaluated the theory of piercing the corporate veil in the context of the relationship between the guarantor and the borrowing company in a dispute arising from a loan agreement...
The European Union continues to be an important investment center for foreign investors. According to data from the European Commission's "Second Annual Report on the monitoring of foreign direct investment in the European Union", the European Union received €117 billion worth of foreign direct investment in...
Transfer of shares is arguably the first legal transaction that comes to mind among the legal transactions regarding the shares of a capital company, and the most common transaction in practice. However, the shares of a capital company may also be subject to various transactions, other than share purchase...
Law No. 6563 on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce (E-commerce Law or Law) has recently undergone a radical change in order to regulate the behavior of the players in the rapidly growing and developing e-commerce sector. The new regulations that came into force as of January 1, 2023 envisage important...
On 11 June 2021, the German Federal Parliament approved the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltsgesetz) (“Act”) which affects not only German entities but also their suppliers in foreign countries (including Turkish entities). The main focus of the Act, which entered into force on...
On 21 December 2007, the Federal Council approved the draft revision of the Swiss Code of Obligations, which also includes amendments to company law. On 28 November 2014, the Federal Council referred the draft revision for consultation. Following extensive discussions and a long enactment process, the...
The Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") regulates maritime trade contracts under the fourth part of the fifth book of the Code. Among the types of contracts regulated in this section, the most frequently used contract in international maritime transport practice is the freight contract regulated under...
Prohibition on hidden income shifting is one of the most important issues that is broadly regulated under Capital Markets Law No. 6362 (“CML”). In conjunction with CML Article 21, which has a broader context than Article 15 of the abrogated Capital Markets Law No. 2499, another significant step has been taken...
As a result of developing commercial activities and large-scale investments, especially concluded in the fields of construction, energy and mining, companies are seeking to participate in these investments by uniting their powers and expertise to take advantage of financial opportunities together. This tendency...
The Turkish Commercial Code (“TCC” or “Law”) has enabled companies to apply different structural models and to implement new legal formations by including spin-off provisions to its Article 159 et seq. In accordance with the provisions of the law, companies may transfer a certain element, or elements, of their...
The International Federation of Consulting Engineers is a professional association established in 1913, known as the FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Counseils). Its members are duly elected from consultant-engineer associations of various countries, and membership to the association is...
Incoterms are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of Incoterms rules is to facilitate and expedite international trade in a safe and secure manner...
The regulation applicable to all Turkish ports prepared by the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications that entered into force after being published in the official gazette on October 31, 2012 (˝the Regulation˝), consolidates all the bylaws, regulations and instructions in a single Regulation...
As a rule, rights and obligations arising from an agreement have legal consequences only between the creditor and the debtor which are parties to the agreement. This principle is referred to as "privity of contract." In general, contracts for the benefit of third parties, where the fulfillment of an...
The rules of e-commerce, which grow and develop with the digitalizing world, are changing. E-commerce has become the driving force of the digital economy. However, considering the growth rate of e-commerce and the transformation it has undergone in a short time, it is obvious that some...
The dissolution of a company is a specific type of dissolution, which results in the cancellation of the legal personality which was gained by registration at incorporation. The specific proceeding which leads to the dissolution, and thus, the termination of a company upon the constitutive decision...
Companies in which shares or authority to manage is held by members of a family are considered to be “family businesses”. Family members can hold shares that control the company, as well as retain management authority. Having a family business means opportunity, security and income for...
Turkey ratified the Convention on the Contract for International Carriage of Goods by Road (“CMR”) in accordance with Act No. 3939 dated 7 December 1993, and the CMR entered into force in Turkey on 31 October 1995. In accordance with Article 1 / 1 of the CMR, the carriage of goods by road...
Ordinary partnerships are governed by Article 620 et seq. of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO”). An ordinary partnership agreement is defined as an agreement whereby two or more persons undertake to join efforts and/or goods to reach a common goal...
The concept of disguised profit transfer in joint stock companies, in its broadest meaning, covers the transfer of company assets to related parties and may occur in different ways. This concept is regulated in detail under capital markets legislation...
Share subscription agreements, which are commonly encountered in start-up investments, set out the terms and conditions of an investor’s participation in a company as a shareholder by subscribing the new shares issued in a capital increase...
The electronic signature, which has the same legal consequences as wet signatures if it meets certain conditions, has taken its place in many legal systems and has enhanced commercial life. Although there are various types and applications in different legal systems...
INCOTERMS are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of the Incoterms rules is to contribute to and facilitate the safe and swift conduct of international trade...