Joint Stock Companies’ Capacity Of Becoming A Surety
General
Before the entry into force of Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 [1] (“TCC”) the capacity of joint stock companies with respect to becoming a guarantor or surety was an important issue, which was assessed within the scope of ultra vires principle (prohibition of transactions out of a company’s purpose). In accordance with the ultra vires principle, which was regulated by the abrogated Turkish Commercial Code No. 6762 [2] (“Abrogated TCC”), joint stock companies did not have legal capacity beyond the company’s subject of activity and, thus, transactions concluded beyond their subjects of activity were deemed to be null and void. The TCC has not included this principle, which limits the company’s capacity with its subject of activity, by taking into consideration the First Council Directive on Companies no. 68/151 of the European Economic Community (“EEC”) [3].
This newsletter article will analyze joint stock companies’ capacity to be the subject of rights, and the capacity with respect to becoming a surety in accordance with the ultra vires principle under the Abrogated TCC, the relevant provisions of TCC, and the Court of Cassation’s decisions rendered with respect to such topic.
Joint Stock Companies as Subjects of Rights
The joint stock companies’ ability to be the subject of rights is extended following the abandonment of the ultra vires principle. Pursuant to the TCC, the companies are entitled to exercise all rights and undertake all obligations pursuant to Art. 48 of the Turkish Civil Code[4] (“Civil Code”), without prejudice to the legal exceptions (TCC Art. 125/2). Moreover, pursuant to Art. 48 of the Civil Code, legal persons are entitled to exercise any rights and obligations apart from the rights and obligations that are specific to persons, such as gender, age, and kinship. Therefore, joint stock companies may enter into transactions, and undertake liabilities, without any limitation regarding the company’s subject of activity. In this respect, even though a company’s purpose and objectives must be stated in its articles of association, the company’s purpose and object is not of vital importance in determining the boundaries of the company’s being the subject of rights, and, in principle, the company is bound by those transactions that are beyond its subject of activity.
The same principle is also regulated in the first paragraph of Art. 371/2 of the TCC regarding representation. In accordance with the said provision, the company is bound by transactions that its authorized representatives conclude with third parties that are beyond the company’s subject of activity. However, Art. 371/2 of the TCC also provides an exception to this principle. If it is proven that the third party knew or was in a position to know that the transaction fell outside the company’s subject, then that joint stock company is not bound by the transaction. The third party who knew, or who was in a position to know, that the transaction fell outside of the company’s field of operation would not be able to claim that it was acting in good faith. The burden of proof lies with the joint stock company in such case. The fact that the articles of association stipulates such issue, or if the articles of association are announced, shall not be deemed as a sufficient proof by itself (TCC Art. 371/2), since the third parties are not under the obligation to know the scope of a company’s subject of activity. Therefore, the third party’s affirmative knowledge is necessary.
An important question that arises within this context is whether the transactions with respect to becoming a surety and providing a guarantee may be assessed within the scope of Art. 371/2 of the TCC. Likewise, if being a surety is assessed as being beyond the subject of activity of the company pursuant to TCC Art. 371/2, such surety shall not bind the company where the articles of association does not include the relevant provision. However, when the transaction of becoming a surety is assessed within the scope of a company’s subject, thus not falling within Art. 371/2 of the TCC, this will result in the joint stock company becoming bound by such surety.
Joint Stock Companies’ Capacity of Becoming a Surety
A joint stock company’s capacity of becoming a surety and providing a guarantee used to be analyzed in accordance with the ultra vires principle, pursuant to the Abrogated TCC. Art. 137 of the Abrogated TCC specified that the companies may acquire any right, and undertake any obligation, provided that they fall within the subject of activity of the company, as stated in the company’s articles of association. The ultra vires principle, and the literal interpretation of such article, could result in the conclusion that companies may not become a surety unless it is expressly provided for in their articles of association. However, the Court of Cassation prevents such interpretation, and concluded in clear and established precedents that such guarantee is in the ordinary course of business of a company.
The Court of Cassation, while evaluating the ultra vires principle, defines a company’s subject of activity as being comprised of the continuous transactions concluded by the company. Additionally, it states that businesses and agreements that are not directly included in a company’s articles of association, while evaluating the ultra vires principle, but which facilitates the business of the company, are required to be included in the company’s subject of activity, even though not specifically set forth in the articles of association. Otherwise, this would be contrary to the natural flow of life. Indeed, the subject of activity of a joint stock company must be evident in the title of the joint stock company, and stipulate the fundamental activity areas of the company, such as tourism, construction and commerce. Joint stock companies may be established for any economic purpose that is not prohibited by the law (TCC Art. 351). Since becoming a surety or providing a guarantee are not regarded as economic activities alone, they do not constitute the purpose and subject of the company. However, they are transactions that intend to effectuate such purpose and subject, and which are included in the ordinary course of business.
In this respect, Court of Cassation decisions that are rendered under the Abrogated TCC with respect to ultra vires principle may be relied upon in order to determine whether becoming a surety or providing a guarantee should be included in the scope of Art. 371/2 of the TCC. Likewise, the established precedents of the Court of Cassation conclude that becoming a surety and providing a guarantee is in the ordinary course of business, and are included in the company’s subject of activity.
Accordingly, the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, in its decision dated 19.07.2005 and numbered 4621/7778[5], ruled that in accordance with established practices in Turkish Law, companies must be deemed capable to conclude surety and guarantee agreements due to their commercial activities, even if such activities are not explicitly stated in their articles of association as an area of activity. Similarly, the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, in its decision dated 07/02/1978 and numbered 7/354[6], stated that: “A company’s subject of activity means commercial transactions concluded regularly by such company. Such transactions are related to the transactions as set forth in the company’s articles of association. However, it is necessary to accept that the businesses and transactions, which do not directly fall into the scope of the company’s subject of activity as specified in its articles of association, but which facilitate the company’s commercial activities, shall be assessed within the scope of the company’s subject of activity. Those companies with commercial purposes may jointly undertake liabilities in order to obtain loans from banks and, therefore, support each other, and maintain their commercial activities in such a way. Such transactions are considered to be among ordinary commercial transactions. Therefore, the surety contract in question shall be deemed within the scope of the company’s subject.”
It is clear from the Court of Cassation’s decisions that surety and guarantee transactions are accepted as those transactions that lie within the scope of a company’s subject of activity, even if they are not included in the articles of association. In other words, being a surety may not be regarded as a transaction, which is beyond the company’s subject of activity, pursuant to Art. 371/2 of the TCC. Art. 371/2 of the TCC shall not apply to surety and guarantee transactions and, thus, joint stock companies may not claim that they are not bound by such transactions. In this respect, a company’s capacity of becoming a surety and providing a guarantee shall be determined pursuant to Art. 125 of the TCC, and the guarantee provided by a joint stock company shall be valid. Considering the fact that the relevant decisions were rendered when the ultra vires principle was valid, Art. 125 of the TCC, which does not refer to the ultra vires principle, will not introduce any novelty on the freedom of becoming a surety, which was already acknowledged by the commercial companies, but will assure the application of this practice setting forth such freedom[7]. For all these reasons, in practice, the banks’ requiring an explicit provision in the articles of association of the joint stock companies with respect to being a surety, or providing a guarantee when taking a guarantee from the companies in order to secure their loans, is inconsistent with the spirit of the TCC, as well as being inconsistent with the established Court of Cassation precedents.
Conclusion
Following the entry into force of the TCC, the principle that limits the companies’ ability to be the subject of rights concerning their subject of activity has lost its validity. However, Art. 371/2 of the TCC, by setting forth a special provision for joint stock companies, ensures that the effect of a company’s subject of activity over representation continues against third parties. In this respect, it is important to understand and examine the meaning of the subject of activity. Pursuant to the established precedents of the Court of Cassation, and pursuant to the doctrine, surety and guarantee transactions are considered to be ordinary transactions of companies, and they are included in companies’ subjects of activity in accordance with the ordinary flow of commercial life even, if they are not explicitly set forth in those companies’ articles of association. Therefore, joint stock companies are entitled to become a surety and provide guarantees even though there is no explicit provision in their articles of association.
[1] Published in Official Gazette dated 14 February 2011 and numbered 27846, and entered into force on 1 July 2012.
[2] Abrogated on 1 July 2012 by the entry into force of the TCC.
[3] http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ date of access: 3 March 2015.
[4] Published in the Official Gazette dated 8 December 2001 and numbered 24607, and entered into force on 01 January 2002.
[5] www.kazancı.com.tr date of access: 3 March.2015.
[6] Seza Reisoğlu, Türk Kefalet Hukuku, Ankara 2013, p. 56.
[7] Burak Özen, Kefalet Sözleşmesi, İstanbul 2012, p.172.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The Turkish automobile and light commercial vehicle market left the 2000s behind with steadily rising sales figures and the 2010s with high and stable sales figures as well. In this period, the growth of the market was driven not only by high purchase power but also by easy access to credit and product diversity...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") provides the right to exit from the company to the shareholders of limited liability companies and the right to squeeze out the shareholder from the company, unlike the structure of joint stock companies, with the exit and squeeze out institutions specially regulated for...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”) preserves the rule that the board of directors shall manage and represent joint stock companies. The TCC regulates how the power of representation shall be exercised, the registration and announcement of the persons authorized to represent, the transfer of the...
Ordinary partnerships are regulated under Turkish Law between Articles 620 and 645 of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO” or the “Code”). The Law defines an ordinary partnership contract as a contract where two or more persons undertake to combine their labour or property to achieve a common...
Merger and acquisition processes are one of the legal processes that most seriously affect the identities and legal status of companies. After the completion of legal, tax, financial and operational due diligence reports, the parties initiate the negotiation process in case they reach an agreement on proceeding with the...
A popular business model for expanding market reach and brand recognition worldwide is franchising. Despite being less common than distribution agreements in the form of mono-brand store agreements, franchising is another significant method for extending luxury brands' distribution networks. Luxury brands use...
In the decision dated 14.06.2022 and numbered 2019/149 E. 2022/894 K., the Court of Cassation General Assembly (“CCGA”) evaluated the theory of piercing the corporate veil in the context of the relationship between the guarantor and the borrowing company in a dispute arising from a loan agreement...
The European Union continues to be an important investment center for foreign investors. According to data from the European Commission's "Second Annual Report on the monitoring of foreign direct investment in the European Union", the European Union received €117 billion worth of foreign direct investment in...
Transfer of shares is arguably the first legal transaction that comes to mind among the legal transactions regarding the shares of a capital company, and the most common transaction in practice. However, the shares of a capital company may also be subject to various transactions, other than share purchase...
Law No. 6563 on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce (E-commerce Law or Law) has recently undergone a radical change in order to regulate the behavior of the players in the rapidly growing and developing e-commerce sector. The new regulations that came into force as of January 1, 2023 envisage important...
On 11 June 2021, the German Federal Parliament approved the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltsgesetz) (“Act”) which affects not only German entities but also their suppliers in foreign countries (including Turkish entities). The main focus of the Act, which entered into force on...
On 21 December 2007, the Federal Council approved the draft revision of the Swiss Code of Obligations, which also includes amendments to company law. On 28 November 2014, the Federal Council referred the draft revision for consultation. Following extensive discussions and a long enactment process, the...
The Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") regulates maritime trade contracts under the fourth part of the fifth book of the Code. Among the types of contracts regulated in this section, the most frequently used contract in international maritime transport practice is the freight contract regulated under...
Prohibition on hidden income shifting is one of the most important issues that is broadly regulated under Capital Markets Law No. 6362 (“CML”). In conjunction with CML Article 21, which has a broader context than Article 15 of the abrogated Capital Markets Law No. 2499, another significant step has been taken...
As a result of developing commercial activities and large-scale investments, especially concluded in the fields of construction, energy and mining, companies are seeking to participate in these investments by uniting their powers and expertise to take advantage of financial opportunities together. This tendency...
The Turkish Commercial Code (“TCC” or “Law”) has enabled companies to apply different structural models and to implement new legal formations by including spin-off provisions to its Article 159 et seq. In accordance with the provisions of the law, companies may transfer a certain element, or elements, of their...
The International Federation of Consulting Engineers is a professional association established in 1913, known as the FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Counseils). Its members are duly elected from consultant-engineer associations of various countries, and membership to the association is...
Incoterms are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of Incoterms rules is to facilitate and expedite international trade in a safe and secure manner...
The regulation applicable to all Turkish ports prepared by the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications that entered into force after being published in the official gazette on October 31, 2012 (˝the Regulation˝), consolidates all the bylaws, regulations and instructions in a single Regulation...
As a rule, rights and obligations arising from an agreement have legal consequences only between the creditor and the debtor which are parties to the agreement. This principle is referred to as "privity of contract." In general, contracts for the benefit of third parties, where the fulfillment of an...
The rules of e-commerce, which grow and develop with the digitalizing world, are changing. E-commerce has become the driving force of the digital economy. However, considering the growth rate of e-commerce and the transformation it has undergone in a short time, it is obvious that some...
The dissolution of a company is a specific type of dissolution, which results in the cancellation of the legal personality which was gained by registration at incorporation. The specific proceeding which leads to the dissolution, and thus, the termination of a company upon the constitutive decision...
Companies in which shares or authority to manage is held by members of a family are considered to be “family businesses”. Family members can hold shares that control the company, as well as retain management authority. Having a family business means opportunity, security and income for...
Turkey ratified the Convention on the Contract for International Carriage of Goods by Road (“CMR”) in accordance with Act No. 3939 dated 7 December 1993, and the CMR entered into force in Turkey on 31 October 1995. In accordance with Article 1 / 1 of the CMR, the carriage of goods by road...
Ordinary partnerships are governed by Article 620 et seq. of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO”). An ordinary partnership agreement is defined as an agreement whereby two or more persons undertake to join efforts and/or goods to reach a common goal...
The concept of disguised profit transfer in joint stock companies, in its broadest meaning, covers the transfer of company assets to related parties and may occur in different ways. This concept is regulated in detail under capital markets legislation...
Share subscription agreements, which are commonly encountered in start-up investments, set out the terms and conditions of an investor’s participation in a company as a shareholder by subscribing the new shares issued in a capital increase...
The electronic signature, which has the same legal consequences as wet signatures if it meets certain conditions, has taken its place in many legal systems and has enhanced commercial life. Although there are various types and applications in different legal systems...
INCOTERMS are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of the Incoterms rules is to contribute to and facilitate the safe and swift conduct of international trade...