Parties to a Share Transfer Agreement and Privity of Contract
Introduction
As a rule, rights and obligations arising from an agreement have legal consequences only between the creditor and the debtor which are parties to the agreement. This principle is referred to as "privity of contract." In general, contracts for the benefit of third parties, where the fulfillment of an obligation is undertaken to a third party other than the parties to the agreement, constitute an exception to the principle of privity of contract. This article will analyze the decision[1] of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 08.06.2021 ("Decision") concerning the question of who is bound by a share transfer agreement where the transfer of goods is undertaken in favor of a company other than the contracting parties, within the scope of the principle of privity of contract.
The Case and the Assessments of the Judicial Authorities
This case concerned a liquidation agreement ("Agreement") signed between the shareholders of the plaintiff company ("Plaintiff") and the shareholders of the defendant company ("Defendant"). The subject matter of the Agreement was the commitment of the real person shareholders who were parties to the Agreement to mutually transfer their shares in the Plaintiff and the Defendant companies. According to the Agreement, vehicles belonging to the Defendant were to be transferred to the Plaintiff or to another company to be nominated by the Plaintiff. However, the Defendant did not transfer the disputed vehicles to the Plaintiff. As a result, the Plaintiff requested the registration of the vehicles in its own name, and if this was not possible, to collect the cost of the vehicles from the Defendant with interest.
The court of first instance dismissed the case due to the Defendant’s lack of standing as the Defendant company was not a party to the Agreement.
The Defendant appealed the decision of the court of first instance, and the Court of Appeal stated that neither the Plaintiff nor the Defendant company was a party to the Agreement, but that the Agreement was a contract for the benefit of third parties made for the benefit of the Plaintiff. According to the Court of Appeal, the shareholders who were parties to the share transfer agreement undertook to ensure the transfer of Defendant’s vehicles to the Plaintiff company. However, there was no commitment made by the authorized body of the Defendant company. The court held that the commitment to transfer the goods made by the shareholders of the Defendant company bound only the shareholders who made the commitment, in accordance with the principle of privity of contract. Therefore, the court dismissed the appeal on the merits.
In its Decision, the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation emphasized that the Agreement was signed by all the shareholders of the Defendant company, and all shareholders authorized to represent the Plaintiff company, and concluded that the argument that these companies were not bound by the Agreement constituted an abuse of right pursuant to Article 2 of the Turkish Civil Code. Consequently, the Court of Appeal's decision of dismissal on the merits was reversed and annulled.
Assessment within the Framework of the Principle of Privity of Contracts
Under Turkish law, the debtor-creditor relationship is of relative nature.[2] As a rule, a contract is effective only between the parties. However, there are some exceptions to the principle of privity of contract. Contracts for the benefit of third parties are one of these exceptions. A contract for the benefit of third parties is a contract in which one of the parties undertakes to fulfill an obligation to the other party for the benefit of a third party. In a contract for the benefit of third parties, granting the third party the right to claim makes an exception to the principle of privity of contract.
Contracts for the benefit of third parties may be established as quasi-contracts for the benefit of third parties and genuine contracts for the benefit of third parties. Whether the contract is quasi or genuine is important due to the different legal consequences. In quasi-contracts for the benefit of third parties, the third party does not have a right to make a claim. In other words, only the parties to the contract can demand the performance of the obligation or the compensation of the damage suffered by the third party due to the failure to perform the obligation properly. In genuine contracts for the benefit of third parties, the beneficiary third party has the right to make a claim. However, even in this case, the third party does not become a party to the contract.[3]
The Court of Cassation has addressed the issue of how to determine whether a contract was drafted for the benefit of a third party:
"It does not seem possible to adopt a definitive principle as to the circumstances under which a contract may be interpreted as a contract for the benefit of third parties. In addition, the balance of interests between the parties, the behavior of the parties after the conclusion of the contract, and especially their behavior towards the relevant third party, are also taken into account in determining whether the third party has a right to make a claim. If it is not clear from the interpretation of the contract that this is the common intention of the parties, custom and usage shall be considered. In some cases, as a matter of custom, the third party may be granted the right to apply directly to the debtor."[4]
The court has also addressed the question of when a third-party beneficiary may make a claim:
"Again, in contracts for the benefit of third parties, it is accepted that the third party cannot make a claim personally. On the contrary, that the third party may make a claim on its behalf must either be expressly written in the contract, or this situation must be understood from the will of the parties expressed in the contract, or there must be a custom in this regard."[5]
It should be noted that in accordance with the principle of freedom of contract, which is closely related to the principle of privity of contract, no one can be forced to enter into a contract against their will. For this reason, while rights can be granted to the third party by the contract for the benefit of third parties, a third party cannot be put under obligation.
It is well known that the parties to a share transfer agreement are generally the person who is a shareholder or who will be a shareholder in the future, and the person who wants to take over the share. Since the share transfer agreement is a transaction between the person who undertakes to transfer the share and the person who undertakes to take over the share, it creates an obligation only between them. In particular, the company has nothing to do with this transaction. Therefore, there is no need for the approval of the company or shareholders for the transfer.[6]
Hence, in the case discussed above, the parties to the share transfer agreement were the shareholders. The Plaintiff and the Defendant companies were not parties to the Agreement, and only the shares in the Plaintiff and the Defendant company constituted the subject of the share transfer agreement. In addition, a commitment to transfer property was made by the shareholders in favor of the Plaintiff company. Based on the interpretation of the Agreement and the common purpose of the parties, even if there was a genuine contract for the benefit of the third-party Plaintiff, it cannot be said that the third-party Plaintiff had become a party to the Agreement. The statement of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation that since the Agreement was signed by all shareholders authorized to represent the Plaintiff and the Defendant company, the assertion that the Agreement is not binding on these companies is an abuse of right within the meaning of Article 2 of the Turkish Civil Code is fundamentally incompatible with the principle of privity of contracts. As far as it is understood from the Decision, there is no explicit commitment made on behalf of the Defendant company in the Agreement.
In this respect, it should be emphasized that legal entities have separate and independent personalities. Holding companies liable for the legal transactions carried out by the shareholders on their own behalf may lead to inappropriate results.
Conclusion
In line with the principles of freedom of contract and privity of contract, contractual rights and obligations can generally only be asserted against the parties. Although there are exceptions to these principles, the exceptions should be handled carefully. Especially in share transfer agreements where the parties to the agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties are defined in detail, the broad interpretation of the “party” definition and direct applicability of the share transfer agreements to the companies which are not parties to the agreement and whose shares are transferred, may involve the danger of exceeding the subject matter of the share transfer agreement. When drafting share transfer agreements, it is important that the contractual provisions intended to be introduced for the benefit of third parties are regulated in a clear manner that leaves no room for doubt.
- The Decision of the 11th CC of Court of Cassation, No. 2020/5838 E. 2021/4864 K., 08.06.2021, https://www.lexpera.com.tr/ictihat/yargitay/11-hukuk-dairesi-e-2020-5838-k-2021-4864-t-8-6-2021 (Access date: 14.07.2022).
- Oğuzman, Kemal/Öz, Turgut: Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, V. 2, Vedat Yayıncılık, 2018, p. 441.
- Oğuzman, Kemal/Öz, Turgut: Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, V. 2, Vedat Yayıncılık, 2018, p. 457.
- The Decision of the 11th CC of Court of Cassation, No. 2015/6780 E., 2015/13211 K., 09.12.2015, https://www.lexpera.com.tr/ictihat/yargitay/11-hukuk-dairesi-e-2015-6780-k-2015-13211-t-9-12-2015 (Access date: 14.07.2022).
- The Decision of the 11th CC of Court of Cassation, No. 2014/16058 E., 2015/1048 K., 02.02.2015, https://www.lexpera.com.tr/ictihat/yargitay/11-hukuk-dairesi-e-2014-16058-k-2015-1048-t-2-2-2015 (Access date: 14.07.2022).
- Demirkapı, Ertan: “Limited Ortaklıkta Payın Devir Vaadi İşleminin Konusu ve Hukuki Niteliği”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, V. 9, Special Issue, 2007, p. 825.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The Turkish automobile and light commercial vehicle market left the 2000s behind with steadily rising sales figures and the 2010s with high and stable sales figures as well. In this period, the growth of the market was driven not only by high purchase power but also by easy access to credit and product diversity...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") provides the right to exit from the company to the shareholders of limited liability companies and the right to squeeze out the shareholder from the company, unlike the structure of joint stock companies, with the exit and squeeze out institutions specially regulated for...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”) preserves the rule that the board of directors shall manage and represent joint stock companies. The TCC regulates how the power of representation shall be exercised, the registration and announcement of the persons authorized to represent, the transfer of the...
Ordinary partnerships are regulated under Turkish Law between Articles 620 and 645 of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO” or the “Code”). The Law defines an ordinary partnership contract as a contract where two or more persons undertake to combine their labour or property to achieve a common...
Merger and acquisition processes are one of the legal processes that most seriously affect the identities and legal status of companies. After the completion of legal, tax, financial and operational due diligence reports, the parties initiate the negotiation process in case they reach an agreement on proceeding with the...
A popular business model for expanding market reach and brand recognition worldwide is franchising. Despite being less common than distribution agreements in the form of mono-brand store agreements, franchising is another significant method for extending luxury brands' distribution networks. Luxury brands use...
In the decision dated 14.06.2022 and numbered 2019/149 E. 2022/894 K., the Court of Cassation General Assembly (“CCGA”) evaluated the theory of piercing the corporate veil in the context of the relationship between the guarantor and the borrowing company in a dispute arising from a loan agreement...
The European Union continues to be an important investment center for foreign investors. According to data from the European Commission's "Second Annual Report on the monitoring of foreign direct investment in the European Union", the European Union received €117 billion worth of foreign direct investment in...
Transfer of shares is arguably the first legal transaction that comes to mind among the legal transactions regarding the shares of a capital company, and the most common transaction in practice. However, the shares of a capital company may also be subject to various transactions, other than share purchase...
Law No. 6563 on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce (E-commerce Law or Law) has recently undergone a radical change in order to regulate the behavior of the players in the rapidly growing and developing e-commerce sector. The new regulations that came into force as of January 1, 2023 envisage important...
On 11 June 2021, the German Federal Parliament approved the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltsgesetz) (“Act”) which affects not only German entities but also their suppliers in foreign countries (including Turkish entities). The main focus of the Act, which entered into force on...
On 21 December 2007, the Federal Council approved the draft revision of the Swiss Code of Obligations, which also includes amendments to company law. On 28 November 2014, the Federal Council referred the draft revision for consultation. Following extensive discussions and a long enactment process, the...
The Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") regulates maritime trade contracts under the fourth part of the fifth book of the Code. Among the types of contracts regulated in this section, the most frequently used contract in international maritime transport practice is the freight contract regulated under...
Prohibition on hidden income shifting is one of the most important issues that is broadly regulated under Capital Markets Law No. 6362 (“CML”). In conjunction with CML Article 21, which has a broader context than Article 15 of the abrogated Capital Markets Law No. 2499, another significant step has been taken...
As a result of developing commercial activities and large-scale investments, especially concluded in the fields of construction, energy and mining, companies are seeking to participate in these investments by uniting their powers and expertise to take advantage of financial opportunities together. This tendency...
The Turkish Commercial Code (“TCC” or “Law”) has enabled companies to apply different structural models and to implement new legal formations by including spin-off provisions to its Article 159 et seq. In accordance with the provisions of the law, companies may transfer a certain element, or elements, of their...
The International Federation of Consulting Engineers is a professional association established in 1913, known as the FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Counseils). Its members are duly elected from consultant-engineer associations of various countries, and membership to the association is...
Incoterms are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of Incoterms rules is to facilitate and expedite international trade in a safe and secure manner...
The regulation applicable to all Turkish ports prepared by the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications that entered into force after being published in the official gazette on October 31, 2012 (˝the Regulation˝), consolidates all the bylaws, regulations and instructions in a single Regulation...
The rules of e-commerce, which grow and develop with the digitalizing world, are changing. E-commerce has become the driving force of the digital economy. However, considering the growth rate of e-commerce and the transformation it has undergone in a short time, it is obvious that some...
The dissolution of a company is a specific type of dissolution, which results in the cancellation of the legal personality which was gained by registration at incorporation. The specific proceeding which leads to the dissolution, and thus, the termination of a company upon the constitutive decision...
Companies in which shares or authority to manage is held by members of a family are considered to be “family businesses”. Family members can hold shares that control the company, as well as retain management authority. Having a family business means opportunity, security and income for...
Turkey ratified the Convention on the Contract for International Carriage of Goods by Road (“CMR”) in accordance with Act No. 3939 dated 7 December 1993, and the CMR entered into force in Turkey on 31 October 1995. In accordance with Article 1 / 1 of the CMR, the carriage of goods by road...
Ordinary partnerships are governed by Article 620 et seq. of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO”). An ordinary partnership agreement is defined as an agreement whereby two or more persons undertake to join efforts and/or goods to reach a common goal...
The concept of disguised profit transfer in joint stock companies, in its broadest meaning, covers the transfer of company assets to related parties and may occur in different ways. This concept is regulated in detail under capital markets legislation...
Share subscription agreements, which are commonly encountered in start-up investments, set out the terms and conditions of an investor’s participation in a company as a shareholder by subscribing the new shares issued in a capital increase...
The electronic signature, which has the same legal consequences as wet signatures if it meets certain conditions, has taken its place in many legal systems and has enhanced commercial life. Although there are various types and applications in different legal systems...
INCOTERMS are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of the Incoterms rules is to contribute to and facilitate the safe and swift conduct of international trade...