Competition Boards Doğuş Otomotiv Decision on Vertical Restrictions in Labor Markets
Introduction
Doğuş Otomotiv Servis ve Ticaret A.Ş. (Doğuş) applied to the Turkish Competition Authority for an exemption for the practice of recommending basic wages to be applied to sales and after-sales service employees of its authorized dealers and distributors . The Turkish Competition Board (the Board) assessed the practice between Doğuş and its dealers, which included a restriction on labor, in the context of a vertical relationship as it was a practice attributable to the main activities of the parties. As a result of its assessments in the context of the Block Exemption Communiqué on Vertical Agreements No. 2002/2 (Communiqué No. 2002/2), the Board concluded that Doğuş’s market share, based on the number of employees in the “labor market for car sales and after-sales services”, was below the 30% market share threshold required under Communiqué Communiqué No. 2002/2 and granted block exemption to the said practice. The Board’s decision (Decision) contains several important findings and assessments regarding the fact that infringements that may occur in labor markets are not limited to horizontal agreements but may also occur vertically, as well as the projection of resale price maintenance practices into the labor market. Given the gap in practice and the Board’s precedent, this decision is considered to be a guideline for the interpretation of competition violations that may occur in labor markets, especially about vertical agreements.
Assessment of the Relevant Product Market and Geographical Market
The agreement which is the subject of the application relates to the recommendation by Doğuş to its authorized dealers and distributors, regarding the monthly salary to be paid to the employees of dealers working under different titles in the job families designated as sales management, service, spare parts, management and operational support. In this context, the Board evaluates Doğuş’s distribution network system. Having a quantitatively selective distribution network in vehicle sales and a qualitatively selective distribution network in after-sales services, Doğuş carries out the sales and sales services activities of the brands it distributes through its subsidiary Doğuş Oto Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. (Doğuş Oto) and its dealers.
In the assessments made by the Board regarding the automotive sector, it is emphasized that for many consumers, after-sales services are as important as the automobile purchase process. It is accepted that the quality of after-sales services has a direct impact on consumer loyalty to the brand from which they receive service. In this respect, after-sales services such as maintenance, repair and spare parts are considered to be as important as price, quality and brand perception in gaining customer loyalty and increasing brand loyalty. Considering the role of quality sales and after-sales services provided in the automotive sector in gaining customer loyalty, the Board, emphasized the relationship between the quality of the service provided and the wages of the employees who provide this service first-hand. In fact, it is believed that if employees are not satisfied with their pay, their motivation may decline and which could have a detrimental impact on quality of service and the continuity of customer relationships and, ultimately, customer loyalty.
In light of the above, it can be seen that the automotive sector is among one of the sectors where after-sales services play a pivotal role, and in this respect, companies operating in the automotive sector try to differentiate themselves in after-sales services, in addition to the physical characteristics of their products, to gain a competitive advantage. As the base wage applied to employees constitutes an important input in the automotive sales and after-sales services, the relevant product market is defined as “the labor market in automotive sales and after-sales services” upon the determination that the effects of the application will arise on employees in the automotive sales and after-sales services market.
In addition, it is accepted that the geographical market may be determined according to personal characteristics such as workers’ preferences, family status, and health status and may be narrowly defined according to provinces and regions depending on changes in living conditions/regional conditions. However, given that the application may affect the personnel employed in Doğuş's dealers and authorized dealers across the country, the relevant geographical market is defined as Turkey.
Assessment on Block Exemption
In its statement, Doğuş indicated that the agreement will result in the recommendation of a basic wage for the sales and after-sales personnel employed by dealers and authorized dealers that will be above the industry average. In addition, it is argued that the recommended base wage will vary across provinces and regions and will not include premium pay or side benefits. It is also stated that the lists of base wage to be recommended will not be shared with the dealer’s employees, but will be announced with a table attached to the email sent to the dealer’s senior management at the same time. In evaluating the aforementioned practice, , it is determined that the practice may provide better quality service to the customers as a consequence of personnel satisfaction with regard to improved wages. Therefore, it is concluded that the practice of imposing restrictions on the labor force element is attributable to the main activities of the parties, namely automotive sales and after-sales services, and therefore, the relationship between Doğuş and its dealers should be considered as a vertical relationship.
Since there is no specific regulation or precedent on whether Doğuş’s publication of the list of recommended wages for the employees of dealers and authorized dealers constitutes a restriction of competition, an analogy is drawn between the circumstances listed in the relevant provision and those not listed in order to determine the abstract norm to be applied to this case. In this context, the Board considers that Doğuş’s publication of the recommended wage list for the personnel of dealers and authorized dealers is similar to determining the purchase price for dealers and dealers. Although the violation of resale price determination, which excludes agreements from the group exemption under Article 4/1(a) of the Communiqué No. 2002/2, only includes a regulation on the buyer's selling price, Article 4/1(a) of Law No. 4054 prohibits the determination of both the purchase and selling prices of goods or services. Therefore, it is concluded that the provisions of Communiqué No. 2002/2 regarding the selling price may also be applied to the buying price to the extent possible.
The Decision contains important conclusions about the projection of the resale price maintenance practice on the labor market. In this context, since the infringement in terms of the determination of employee wages will take place in the input market, the determination of maximum and fixed prices is considered an infringement, unlike the regulation in Article 4/1(a) of Communiqué No. 2002/2. In this context, it is emphasized that if a supplier sends a list of fixed or maximum wages to be applied to the employees of dealers or authorized dealers, and if, as a result of pressure or incentive, the advisory wages to the dealer turn into fixed or maximum wages, the practice will constitute a vertical infringement arising in the labor market.
For the above-mentioned reasons, although the application has an advisory nature, it may lead to the solidification of employee wages by affecting wages, and in this context, the transfer and mobility of labor may be restricted. Therefore, it has been assessed that the agreement subject to the application is within the scope of Article 4 of Law No. 4054, and therefore, a negative clearance certificate cannot be issued for the agreement.
On the other hand, in the assessment made within the scope of the group exemption under Communiqué No. 2002/2, a supplier’s market share should not exceed 30% in order to implement the recommended price practice. In this context Doğuş's market share in the automotive sales and after-sales services market was analyzed based on the number of employees. Consequently, it is determined that Doğuş’s market share calculated on the number of employees for each business family does not exceed 30%.
In addition, the market position Doğuş’s is also analyzed by indicating that in instances where the provider has significant market power, maximum and recommended prices can be regarded as reference wages among dealers without the existence of any pressure or incentive.
In this context, the recommended base wages proposed by Doğuş are compared with the wages paid by its subsidiaries and dealers to employees in similar positions across different provinces and branches. As a result, it is concluded that dealers tend to refrain from adhering to recommended base wage list to be published by Doğuş.
Conclusion
In light of the above, the Authority has asked the opinion of Doğuş's dealers about the base wage practice and it has been assessed that the majority of the dealers independently determine the salaries for the employees and that the practice is guiding in terms of facilitating access to qualified personnel and independent salary reports.
In consideration of the aforementioned circumstances, the Authority has sought the counsel of Doğuş’s dealers regarding the practice of recommending of base wages. In this context, the majority of dealers considered that employees' wages are set independently and that this practice is leading in terms of facilitating access to qualified staff and independent wage reports. As a result, as a result of the evaluations made within the scope of Communiqué No. 2002/2, group exemption was granted to the practice of recommending base wages to be considered in the wages of employees based on each province. The Decision contains noteworthy findings in terms of eliminating the precedential gap in the assessment of vertical infringements in labor markets and determining the abstract norm to be applied to these violations. It is considered that the Decision will have an impact in terms of drawing the boundaries of agreements containing restrictions on labor force by undertakings and adopting interpretative principles in the Board’s future evaluations of such agreements.
- Board’s decision numbered 23-41/796-280 and dated 0 7.09.2023
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
Access to Instagram was blocked ex officio by the Information and Communication Technologies Authority (ICTA) as of 2.08.2024. Under Article 8 of Law No. 5651 on the Regulation of Publications on the Internet and Combating Crimes Committed Through These Publications, ICTA can issue an ex officio access...
It is well known that agreements between employer undertakings with regards to their employees, such as wage-fixing and non-poaching agreements, along with competitively sensitive information exchanges have been under the scrutiny of competition authorities all over the world, including the Turkish Competition...
Automotive is one of the sectors in which the world’s most significant investments are made. The Competition Board (“Board”) has been closely interested in the automotive sector over the years and has conducted various examinations and studies in this field...
Competition authorities around the world continue unabated to investigate competition concerns arising from data collection and processing activities of digital platforms and impose severe sanctions as a result...
The startup ecosystem in Turkey has experienced notable growth in recent years. In the last quarter of 2023, 81 startups secured a combined investment of around 60 million dollars. While the number of investments remained consistent when comparing the third quarter periods of 2022-2023, there was a decrease...
Hub and Spoke cartel is a type of violation that is not clearly defined and regulated under Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). Decisional practices of foreign competition authorities, particularly the UK Competition and Markets Authority’s decisions (“CMA”), are instructive concerning...
The Competition Board ("Board") made an addition to its line of decisions on resale price maintenance with its decision on Sunny Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. ("Sunny") . In its decision, the Board thoroughly examined the allegations regarding Sunny's involvement in maintaining resale prices and restricting...
It is observed that the Competition Authority (“Authority”) has recently scrutinized various industries such as fast-moving consumer goods, labor market, pharmaceuticals, and cement. When the reasoned decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) published in October are examined, it can be seen that the...
Jules Verne says, “Everything on earth has a limited lifespan, nothing that will exist forever can be created by human hands”. Perhaps change is the only constant concept in all our lives. Despite two major world wars and countless periods of crisis, humanity has been undergoing a great change and...
At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...
In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...
In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...
Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...
Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...
Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...
In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested...
In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...
Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...
Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...
The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...
“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel...
Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...
The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...
While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...
The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...
The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...
Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...
Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...
The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...
Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes...
During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...
When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...
The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...
Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...