Amendments in the Law on the Protection of Competition
Law No. 7246 Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition, which has been in the draft phase for a long time (“Law No. 7246”) entered into force by being published in the Official Gazette dated 24.06.2020 and numbered 31165. Law No. 7246 brought important amendments to Law on the Protection of Competition numbered (“Law No. 4054”).
Law No. 7246 contains the most comprehensive amendments since the adoption of Law No. 4054, and deficiencies have been completed with the amendments. Law No. 7246 amends 12 Articles of Law No. 4054 regarding the undertakings and organizational structure of the Competition Authority ("Authority") and competition expertise.
The changes concerning particularly the undertakings are summarized, below:
Amendments were made to the exemption system
Article 4 of Law No. 4054 prohibits agreements and concerted practices between undertakings and decisions and practices of associations of undertakings that limit competition. The prohibition is not absolute, and if the conditions listed in Article 5 of Law No. 4054 are satisfied, undertakings may be exempted from the application of the provisions of Article 4.
Even though prior to the amendment, Article 5 of Law No. 4054 noted, "The relevant undertakings or undertakings of associations may apply to the Authority to be determined by the Board that the agreement, concerted action or decision of association of the undertaking under Article 4 meet the exemption conditions," it was changed to read, "In case of the existence of all of the conditions stated, below, the agreement, the concerted action and the decision of the association of undertakings are exempt from the application of the provisions of Article 4."
There are two important changes in this context. Firstly, the debate over whether the Authority has discretion to grant exemptions has ended. With Law No. 7246, it has been clarified that the agreements will be exempted from the application of the provisions of Article 4, if all of the conditions listed in Article 5 are present.
Secondly, since the phrase “may apply to the Authority,” has been removed with the amendment, it is now possible for the undertakings to apply to the courts for exemption.
It should be noted that it is possible for the undertakings to make a “self-assessment” if they believe that their agreements meet the conditions listed in Article 5. It is not obligatory to obtain permission from the Authority or the courts. However, in order to prevent an incorrect evaluation, if the undertakings wish to apply for exemption, they may both apply to the Authority or the courts.
In concentration analysis, instead of the dominant position test, a “significant impediment of effective competition” test is introduced
The first paragraph of Article 7 of Law No. 4054 has been changed with Law No. 7246 in a way that the effects that may result from the merger and acquisition transactions will be subject to a significant impediment of effective competition test.
While the dominance test was applied to the transactions submitted to the Authority prior to the amendment, now a significant impediment of effective competition test, which is currently applied in the European Union, will be put into effect. Within this context, being dominant or strengthening the existing dominant position are not stated as the only criteria in the evaluation of the effects of mergers and acquisitions, but they are stated as examples of situations wherein effective competition will significantly decrease.
In this case, it is appropriate to say that the limits of the test have been expanded since it is possible to intervene in the concentration processes that do not create a dominant position, or strengthen the current dominant position.
Competition Board (“Board”) is given the authority to apply structural measures
By changing the first paragraph of Article 9 of Law No. 4054, a regulation has been introduced that the Board may apply to structural measures in cases where behavioral measures do not yield results.
Structural measures known as division, decomposition, and separation of the undertakings may only be applied after applying behavioral measures, and determining that no results can be obtained through behavioral measures.
Authority's on-site inspection powers are expanded
With the amendment made in paragraph (a) of the first paragraph of Article 15 of Law No. 4054, the scope of the Board's authority during on-site inspections has been detailed to include the books, data and documents kept in the physical/electronic environment and the information systems of the undertakings.
The Authority conducts inspections in the undertakings and association of undertakings within the scope of the preliminary investigations and investigations carried out, and examines the computers, e-mails, agendas, Whatsapp correspondence of the employees of the undertakings. In this context, the Board has very extensive authority. With the amendment, the scope of the on-site inspection has become clear, and uniformity has been achieved between the application of the Board and the text of the Law.
De minimis rule
With Law No. 7246, the sub-paragraph, below, has been added to Article 41 of Law No. 4054:
"The Board may refrain from starting an investigation for the agreements, concerted actions and decisions of associations of undertakings that do not significantly restrict competition based on criteria, such as market share and turnover, except for clear and severe violations, such as price determination among competitors, territory or customer sharing, and restriction of supply. The procedures and principles regarding the implementation of this paragraph are determined by the communiqué issued by the Board.”
With the amendment, in line with European Union legislation, it has been decided that an investigation may not be initiated by the Board for some agreements, concerted actions and decisions of associations of undertakings that have a low impact on competition.
According to De-minimis Notice (2014 / C 291/01) being implemented in the European Union, if there is no serious and clear violation, and the total market share of undertakings that are parties to the violation is below 10% if they are competitors, and below 15% if they are not competitors, then they will not be subject to investigation. The principles regarding the implementation of the amendment in Turkey, such as market share and turnover of the undertakings, will be determined in the coming days by a communique issued by the Board.
Commitment and reconciliation mechanisms are introduced
Two important mechanisms brought by the amendments in favour of the undertakings are commitment and reconciliation mechanisms.
- Commitment mechanism
Paragraph 3 of Article 9 of Law No. 4054 regulates that the Board may inform the undertakings or associations of undertakings in writing of its opinions concerning how to terminate the infringement. In this context, there are violations in which the Board sent an opinion without imposing a penalty. However, since the decisions of Article 9/3 have opinion value, there have been problems with the application of it.
With the commitment mechanism, the undertakings will have the opportunity to submit a commitment during a preliminary investigation and investigation within the scope of Law 4 of 4054 (agreements, concerted actions and decisions restricting the competition) and Article 6 (abuse of dominant position). If the commitments in question are deemed sufficient by the Board, it is possible for the Board to make these commitments binding, and decide not to open an investigation, or to terminate the current investigation.
However, in the case of severe violations, such as price determination amongst competitors, region or customer sharing, submission of a commitment is not accepted.
In addition, although it is possible to terminate the preliminary investigation or investigation with a commitment, if i) there is a substantial change in any element that constitutes the basis of the decision, ii) the related undertaking or association of undertakings acts contrary to the commitments, or iii) the decision is made based on incomplete, incorrect or misleading information submitted by the parties, an investigation may be re-opened.
- Reconciliation Mechanism
Article 43 of the Law no. 4054 regulates that after the investigation is opened, until the notification of the investigation report, the Board may initiate the reconciliation process at the request of the relevant parties or ex officio for all violations, including the severe violations. Accordingly, the existence and scope of the violation must be accepted within the scope of reconciliation, and as a result of the reconciliation mechanism, up to a 25% reduction in administrative fines may be assessed. It is also regulated that if the investigation is terminated by the settlement mechanism, the parties may not apply to the court, and administrative fines, and the issues in the settlement agreement, cannot be the subject of the case. Secondary regulations on how to implement commitment and reconciliation mechanisms are expected to be explanatory.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...
In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...
In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...
Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...
Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...
Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...
In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested...
In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...
Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...
Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...
The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...
“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel...
Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...
The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...
While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...
The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...
The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...
Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...
Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...
The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...
Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes...
During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...
When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...
The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...
Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...