Federal Trade Commission's Final Rule on Non-Compete Agreements
Introduction
It is well known that agreements between employer undertakings with regards to their employees, such as wage-fixing and non-poaching agreements, along with competitively sensitive information exchanges have been under the scrutiny of competition authorities all over the world, including the Turkish Competition Authority (“TCA”).
Turkish Competition Board (“TCB”) has launched full-fledged investigations into many companies operating in Turkey in the past few years, while concluding that non-poaching and wage-fixing agreements between employers are in nature of cartel agreements and should be penalized as such. TCB has also stated that exchanging information between employers regarding their employees’ wages and side benefits would also amount to competitively sensitive information exchange which could indirectly lead to wage fixing, thereby limiting the employees’ power and ability to switch jobs.
Despite all, TCB and other competition authorities were adamant that they were investigating these agreements and information exchanges between employee undertakings, as competition law applies to undertakings only and stated that non-compete clauses between an employee and an employer in labor agreements were out of their jurisdiction.
In the meantime, with a ground-breaking decision, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), which enforces various antitrust laws in the United States of America, has issued a final rule outlawing the use of non-compete agreements and clauses across the United States (“Final Rule”).
FTC’s Reasoning Behind Its Final Rule
Before issuing its Final Rule, FTC issued a proposed rule to ban the non-compete clause, by allowing a 90-day public comment period. Throughout the public comment period, the FTC stated that it had received 26,000 comments and 25,000 of them were in favor of banning the use of non-compete clauses.
Although Commissioner Wilson dissented from the Proposed Rule suggesting that it “represents a radical departure from hundreds of years of legal precedent that employs a fact-specific inquiry” and that such a rule would “lead to protracted litigation” , after reviewing the comments and despite Wilson’s dissent, FTC issued the Final Rule where it banned non-competes nationwide, only with an exception for use of existing non-competes for senior executive.
FTC stated that non-competes often force workers to stay in their jobs, switch to a lower-paying field, be forced to relocate, or leave the workforce altogether, or be forced to defend against expensive litigation. FTC also suggested that there was evidence that proved that non-compete clauses hindered innovation and business dynamism, preventing entrepreneurs from forming competing businesses, and ultimately harming consumers.
The FTC also mentioned that employers had many alternatives other than the use of non-compete clauses in order to protect their investments. It is stated in the Final Rule that non-disclosure agreements (“NDA”) and the protection offered by various trade secret laws could be utilized to protect sensitive information of employers, instead of use of non-competes.
The Final Rule
Under the Final Rule, the FTC decided that non-compete agreements amounted to an unfair method of competition and therefore a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. To that end, it banned employers from entering into and/or enforcing existing non-competes with their employees.
Having said that, the Final Rule contains an exception to non-competes executed with senior executives, who are defined as employees earning more than $151,164 and are in a policy-making position. According to the FTC’s Final Rule,
- Non-Competes for Senior Executives: Existing non-competes for senior executives can remain in force. However, the employers are prohibited from entering into or enforcing new non-competes with senior executives.
- Non-Competes for Other Employees: Existing non-competes are not enforceable after the effective date and the employers are prohibited from entering into or enforcing new non-competes.
Following the ruling, the employers will now have to provide notice to their employees that the non-compete agreement will not be enforced against them in the future.
According to the FTC, banning non-competes will result in reduced health care costs, a 2.7% increase in the rate of new firm formation, resulting in an additional 8,500 new businesses created each year, a rise in innovation and higher worker earnings: $400-$488 billion in increased wages for workers over the next decade.
The final rule is set to go into effect on September 4, 2024. Having said that, a lawsuit has been filed to set aside the Final Rule by Ryan LLC, a global tax services firm whose principal place of business is in the Northern District of Texas because that the FTC lacks statutory authority to issue the rule since all legislative powers vest in Congress and that the Congress did not invest the Commission with authority to decide whether non-compete agreements are categorically unfair and anti-competitive.
The US Chamber of Commerce also filed a lawsuit in US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas arguing that the non-competes have never been regulated at the federal level and without authorizing legislation, federal agencies have not previously sought to play a role in regulating non-compete agreements on a nationwide basis. They continued to suggest that by invalidating existing noncompete agreements and prohibiting businesses and their workers from ever entering into such agreements going forward, nondisclosure agreements and trade-secret lawsuits would be highly inadequate and expensive alternatives for employers to be able to protect their confidential information. Having said that, the judge suspended the Chamber of Commerce’s lawsuit citing a rule that allows a district court to transfer, stay, or dismiss an action when a similar complaint has already been filed in another federal court. The judge also allowed the Chamber to intervene in Ryan’s case which was filed earlier in a separate Texas court.
Conclusion
In light of the lawsuits that have been filed, whether US courts will uphold the Final Rule and ban the use of non-compete agreements between employers and employees in the United States remains a mystery. Similarly regardless of the outcome of the US lawsuits, whether competition authorities and most importantly the TCA will adopt the same approach with the FTC regarding the use of non-compete clauses and agreements remains a mystery. Having said that, FTC clearly states on its website that market participants may report information about a suspected violation of the rule to the Bureau of Competition by emailing noncompete@ftc.gov once the rule becomes effective.
- Kurul’un 22-10/152-62 sayı ve 24.02.2022 tarihli kararı
- “FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes” available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/04/ftc-announces-rule-banning-noncompetes
- “FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes” available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/04/ftc-announces-rule-banning-noncompetes
- Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Christine S. Wilson Regarding the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the Non-Compete Clause Rule available at https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/p201000noncompetewilsondissent.pdf
- “FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes” available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/04/ftc-announces-rule-banning-noncompetes
- https://files.lbr.cloud/public/2024-04/Ryan.pdf?VersionId=0yu9qPkQFUOJ5XXAaZvtgXK4EzWprx7N
- https://www.uschamber.com/cases/antitrust-and-competition-law/chamber-v-ftc
- https://www.uschamber.com/assets/documents/Order-Chamber-v.-FTC-E.D.-Tex.pdf
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
Automotive is one of the sectors in which the world’s most significant investments are made. The Competition Board (“Board”) has been closely interested in the automotive sector over the years and has conducted various examinations and studies in this field...
Competition authorities around the world continue unabated to investigate competition concerns arising from data collection and processing activities of digital platforms and impose severe sanctions as a result...
The startup ecosystem in Turkey has experienced notable growth in recent years. In the last quarter of 2023, 81 startups secured a combined investment of around 60 million dollars. While the number of investments remained consistent when comparing the third quarter periods of 2022-2023, there was a decrease...
Hub and Spoke cartel is a type of violation that is not clearly defined and regulated under Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). Decisional practices of foreign competition authorities, particularly the UK Competition and Markets Authority’s decisions (“CMA”), are instructive concerning...
The Competition Board ("Board") made an addition to its line of decisions on resale price maintenance with its decision on Sunny Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. ("Sunny") . In its decision, the Board thoroughly examined the allegations regarding Sunny's involvement in maintaining resale prices and restricting...
It is observed that the Competition Authority (“Authority”) has recently scrutinized various industries such as fast-moving consumer goods, labor market, pharmaceuticals, and cement. When the reasoned decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) published in October are examined, it can be seen that the...
Jules Verne says, “Everything on earth has a limited lifespan, nothing that will exist forever can be created by human hands”. Perhaps change is the only constant concept in all our lives. Despite two major world wars and countless periods of crisis, humanity has been undergoing a great change and...
At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...
In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...
In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...
Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...
Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...
Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...
In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested...
In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...
Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...
Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...
The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...
“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel...
Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...
The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...
While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...
The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...
The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...
Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...
Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...
The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...
Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes...
During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...
When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...
The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...
Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...