Liberalization Process in Electricity Market in Terms of Competition Law

April 2015 Ecem Süsoy Uygun
% 0

Introduction

Legislation regarding the electricity market initiated its development in the first decade of this century. Primarily, Electricity Market Law No. 4628 (“Law No. 4628”) was approved on 20.02.2001, and then, Electricity Market Law No. 6446 (“Electricity Market Law”), which was published in the Official Gazette dated 30.03.2013 and numbered 28603, took its place. Law No. 4628 was not abrogated with the entry into force of the Electricity Market Law; it was partially amended, however, and its name was altered to the Law on Organization and Duties of Energy Market Regulatory Authority.

Within the framework of the recent legislation that entered into force, a competitive environment in The Turkish electricity market was created by virtue of restructuring with an aim towards liberalization. With regard to the process of the establishment of a competitive electricity market, the Competition Authority (“Authority”) published the Report on Wholesale and Retail Electricity Market Sector Inquiry (“Report”)[1]. One of the subject matters that is thoroughly examined in this Report is the liberalization process of the electricity market. This article briefly discusses the liberalization process of the electricity market, in light of the aforesaid Report of the Authority.

General Overview of the Liberalization Process of the Electricity Market

Along with the changes come into play since the entry into force of the Electricity Market Law, the establishment of a competitive environment in The Turkish electricity market accelerated. The aim of the Electricity Market Law is to create a financially powerful, stabilized and transparent electric energy market that operates competitively, in accordance with private law provisions, and to provide independent regulations and auditing procedures within this market, for the purpose of procuring sufficient, high-quality, constant, and low-cost electricity to consumers.

In the past, the generation, transmission, distribution and retail operations of electricity was on public property, in a vertically integrated structure. In order to enable entry into the electricity market, and to create a sector where balanced competition is achieved, the division of a vertically integrated monopoly market has arisen. This division could be defined as the separation of the transmission and distribution, which are, collectively, considered as a natural monopoly from the perspective of generation and marketing.

Determining market entrance and exit conditions, as well as the tariffs regulating the services that enterprises utilize and/or submit, and the retention of anti-competitive activities of the enterprises, are essential to establish competition in the marketplace[2].

As is stated in the Report, the first stage of the liberalization process of The Turkish electricity markets was the period after the division of the Turkish Electricity Institution (“TEI”). The TEI was divided into the Türkiye Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. (the Turkish Electricity Generation Company) (“TEAŞ”) and Türkiye Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş. (the Turkish Electricity Distribution Company) (“TEDAŞ”). Afterwards, TEAŞ split into three independent entities.

As of 2001, which was the year when Law No. 4628 entered into force, the private sector took its place in the electricity market and many privatizations ensued. The Report stated that by virtue of the provisions of the Electricity Market Law regarding wholesale markets, as of 2013, a new period for the establishment of a well-operated, liquid wholesale market has commenced.

Developments in Generation within the Liberalization Process

In the Report, it is set forth that due to the fact that electric energy generation requires large-scaled investments, these private sector investments in the Turkish electricity market has started with the establishment of Build Operate-Build Operate Transfer plants. It is foreseen in the Report that the private sector’s role in electric energy generation will increase by privatizations.

The variety of resources in the generation of electricity contributes to the establishment of a competitive market. The Report determines that among the electricity generation resources, natural gas plants have a ratio of 43.63% in 2012. Consequently, when the high ratio of natural gas among electricity generation resources is taken into consideration, the liberalization process of the electricity and natural gas markets interact. However, in light of the determination made in the Report, within the context of the current situation, as well as taking into account the forecasts for 2017, the generation from hydraulic resources is also significant in the Turkish electricity generation market.

Developments in the Wholesale Market within the Liberalization Process

Türkiye Elektrik Ticaret ve Taahhüt A.Ş. (the Turkish Electricity Trade and Undertaking Company) (“TETAŞ”), was established as the first wholesale company in accordance with Law No. 4628 and as it is indicated in the Report, TETAŞ undertakes liabilities for a smooth transition in order to attain a competitive market.

TETAŞ is responsible for the sale and purchase of energy that arise from long-term agreements, which are concluded by the state. TETAŞ is active in trading and undertaking electricity on behalf of the state, and purchases electricity energy from the Türkiye Elektrik Üretim A.Ş.’s (Turkish Electricity Generation Company) (“EÜAŞ”) power plants that operate pursuant to the Build Operate–Build Operate Transfer-Transfer of Operational Rights model, and other countries, as well as from the Balancing Market operated by the Market Financial Settlement Center (“MFSC”). It is also involved in sales to concerned electricity-to-electricity distribution companies, authorized supplier companies, as well as customers who have direct access to the transmission system and to the other countries in accordance with exportation agreements and the Balancing Market operated by the MFSC[3].

In 2011, the most significant step for the Turkish electric market was the establishment of the Day Ahead Market. The establishment of the relevant market energized the Turkish electricity market and promoted the establishment of a competitive market[4]. Participation to the Day Ahead Market is not obligatory; however, all licensed legal persons may participate in the Day Ahead Market by signing the Day Ahead Market Accession Agreement. In the Day Ahead Market, participants who are present propose to sell and purchase each hour of the following day, and then Market Clearing Price is established at the point where supply and demand is aligned. Following the closing of the Day Ahead Market, real-time activities with the purpose to eliminate real-time distortions regarding supply and demand is conducted in accordance with the rules that cover the Balancing Power Market.

Therefore, with the impact of the Day Ahead Market and Balancing Power Market, a market structure that is based on bilateral agreements is targeted in The Turkish electricity market. Although the proportion of the bilateral agreements concluded by the private sector is low, the Report states that the increase of that proportion is the main reason and result of the process on the establishment of a liquid wholesale market.

Another development in the electricity market might be specified as the definition of the organized electricity wholesale market by the Electricity Market Law. As stated in the Report, defining the organized electricity wholesale market, and rendering day-ahead and intra-day markets, balancing-ancillary services market, physical and derivative markets made functional by the establishment of the electricity stock market plays a significant role in the liberalization of the market. Finally, the establishment of Enerji Piyasaları İşletme Anonim Şirketi (the Energy Market Operation Company) (“EPİAŞ”) to operate in the organized electricity wholesale market was targeted, and it was established on 12.03.2015. The establishment of EPİAŞ is considered as a substantial element to realize a functioning and transparent market.

Developments in Retail Sale Market During the Liberalization Process

The Report states that the most significant step regarding the liberalization and marketization of the retail market is undoubtedly the privatization of electricity distribution companies between January 2009 and July 2013, which was previously held by TEDAŞ, and, therefore, the operation of the distribution and retail sale activities of electricity by the private sector. The acquisition of all of the electricity distribution companies by the private sector was completed between 2009 and 2013.

Another important step for liberalization of the electricity market is the gradual decrease of the free consumer limit. In accordance with the graphics on the evolution of the theoretic and actual proportions of the openness of the market (the proportion showing the marketization level which is calculated by the division of the free consumer consumptions with the total amount of consumption) concerning the period between December, 2011, and January, 2014, as presented by the Report, the actual level of liberalization is far behind the theoretical level of liberalization, and the decrease of the free consumer limit does not assure the actual benefit by consumers from the right of the free consumer and competition in the retail sales market.

With the liberalization of the Turkish electricity market, consumers may choose among the distribution companies and prefer to conclude contracts with a company that provides the best service. However, a chart presented by the Report demonstrates that between the period of July, 2013, and April, 2014, the consumers exercising the right of the free consumer purchases services from official distribution companies, and do not conclude agreements with other distribution companies, although the distribution and retail sales are to be operated by the separate legal entities. The market share of the independent distribution companies is negligible for private residences, and is higher for consumers in a commercial group, than in an industrial group. Accordingly, consumers in the residential and industrial groups that have a consumption amount higher than the free consumer limit may continue to purchase electricity pursuant to the tariffs provided.

Conclusion

In order for the Turkish electricity market to become competitive, the market model should be planned at every step, and competitive elements should be in accordance with each other. Since the 2000’s, liberalization of the Turkish electricity market is commenced, and a free and competitive market system took the place of the system of sole purchaser and seller. The Report published by the Authority assesses the evolution of liberalization of the Turkish electricity market in terms of legislation and market structure and the marketization process along with the current market situation.

References

All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.

Other Contents

Selective Distribution System under Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
Supervision of Concentrations in Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
Supervision of Concentrations in Competition Law
Competition Law September 2015
Merger Control Regime for Startup Investments
Newsletter Articles
Merger Control Regime for Startup Investments

The startup ecosystem in Turkey has experienced notable growth in recent years. In the last quarter of 2023, 81 startups secured a combined investment of around 60 million dollars. While the number of investments remained consistent when comparing the third quarter periods of 2022-2023, there was a decrease...

Competition Law 31.12.2023
Competition Board’s Decision on Hub and Spoke Cartel in the Retail Sector
Newsletter Articles
Competition Board’s Decision on Hub and Spoke Cartel in the Retail Sector

Hub and Spoke cartel is a type of violation that is not clearly defined and regulated under Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). Decisional practices of foreign competition authorities, particularly the UK Competition and Markets Authority’s decisions (“CMA”), are instructive concerning...

Competition Law 30.11.2023
Turkish Competition Board’s Sunny Decision on Resale Price Maintenance and Indirect Information
Newsletter Articles
Turkish Competition Board’s Sunny Decision on Resale Price Maintenance and Indirect Information

The Competition Board ("Board") made an addition to its line of decisions on resale price maintenance with its decision on Sunny Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. ("Sunny") . In its decision, the Board thoroughly examined the allegations regarding Sunny's involvement in maintaining resale prices and restricting...

Competition Law 30.11.2023
Competition Board's Investigations in Cosmetics Industry
Newsletter Articles
Competition Board's Investigations in Cosmetics Industry

It is observed that the Competition Authority (“Authority”) has recently scrutinized various industries such as fast-moving consumer goods, labor market, pharmaceuticals, and cement. When the reasoned decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) published in October are examined, it can be seen that the...

Competition Law 31.10.2023
Advertising Restrictions in Competition Law; Non-Targeting and Negative Matching
Newsletter Articles
Advertising Restrictions in Competition Law; Non-Targeting and Negative Matching

Jules Verne says, “Everything on earth has a limited lifespan, nothing that will exist forever can be created by human hands”. Perhaps change is the only constant concept in all our lives. Despite two major world wars and countless periods of crisis, humanity has been undergoing a great change and...

Competition Law 31.10.2023
A Recent CAS Decision in the Scope of European Union Competition Law: FIFA vs. Agents
Newsletter Articles
A Recent CAS Decision in the Scope of European Union Competition Law: FIFA vs. Agents

At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...

Competition Law 30.09.2023
CJEU Judgment in Super Bock: New Insight on Resale Price Maintenance
Newsletter Articles
CJEU Judgment in Super Bock: New Insight on Resale Price Maintenance

Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...

Competition Law 31.07.2023
The Relationship Between Economic Entity and Family Ties in Light of Competition Board Decisions
Newsletter Articles
The Relationship Between Economic Entity and Family Ties in Light of Competition Board Decisions

In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...

Competition Law 31.07.2023
A New Breath of Fresh Air for Competition Investigations from the Constitutional Court
Newsletter Articles
A New Breath of Fresh Air for Competition Investigations from the Constitutional Court

In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...

Competition Law 30.06.2023
Competition Law Practices in the Online Advertising Market
Newsletter Articles
Competition Law Practices in the Online Advertising Market

Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...

Competition Law 30.06.2023
Selective Distribution Systems
Newsletter Articles
Selective Distribution Systems

Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...

Competition Law 31.05.2023
Final Sector Inquiry Report of the Competition Authority Regarding Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Retailing
Newsletter Articles
Final Sector Inquiry Report of the Competition Authority Regarding Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Retailing

Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...

Competition Law 30.04.2023
Constitutional Court's Evaluation of the Competition Board's Authority to Conduct On-Site Investigations
Newsletter Articles
Constitutional Court's Evaluation of the Competition Board's Authority to Conduct On-Site Investigations

In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested...

Competition Law 30.04.2023
Gun Jumping in Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
Gun Jumping in Turkish Competition Law

In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...

Competition Law 31.03.2023
The Problem of Returning the Data Obtained as a Result of Unlawful Notification in Light of the Competition Board Decision
Newsletter Articles
The Problem of Returning the Data Obtained as a Result of Unlawful Notification in Light of the Competition Board Decision

Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...

Competition Law 28.02.2023
The European Commission Accepts Amazon’s Commitments
Newsletter Articles
The European Commission Accepts Amazon’s Commitments

Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...

Competition Law 31.01.2023
Deletion of WhatsApp Correspondence During On-Site Inspections
Newsletter Articles
Deletion of WhatsApp Correspondence During On-Site Inspections

The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...

Competition Law 31.10.2022
Amendment on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce: “The Fire of Mount Doom”
Newsletter Articles
Amendment on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce: “The Fire of Mount Doom”

“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel...

Competition Law 30.09.2022
Turkish Competition Board Fines Digiturk
Newsletter Articles
Turkish Competition Board Fines Digiturk

Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...

Competition Law 30.09.2022
The French Competition Authority’s Decision on Meta’s Commitments
Newsletter Articles
The French Competition Authority’s Decision on Meta’s Commitments

The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...

Competition Law 31.07.2022
A Different Approach to Monetary Fines for Hindering On-Site Inspection: The Decision of the Ankara II. Administrative Court
Newsletter Articles
A Different Approach to Monetary Fines for Hindering On-Site Inspection: The Decision of the Ankara II. Administrative Court

While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...

Competition Law 31.07.2022
Hub and Spoke Cartel in Comparative Law
Newsletter Articles
Hub and Spoke Cartel in Comparative Law

The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...

Competition Law April 2022
The First Settlement Case in Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The First Settlement Case in Turkish Competition Law

The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...

Competition Law April 2022
The E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry Final Report and What It Brings
Newsletter Articles
The E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry Final Report and What It Brings

Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...

Competition Law April 2022
Amendments Introduced to the Communique Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring Competition Board’s Approval
Newsletter Articles
Amendments Introduced to the Communique Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring Competition Board’s Approval

Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...

Competition Law March 2022
A New Glance at Online Sales: The Competition Board’s BSH Decision
Newsletter Articles
A New Glance at Online Sales: The Competition Board’s BSH Decision

The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...

Competition Law March 2022
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 2: “Shahmaran’s Story”
Newsletter Articles
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 2: “Shahmaran’s Story”

Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes...

Competition Law February 2022
Online Sales Within The Framework Of Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The Effects of the Recent Decision by the Turkish Competition Board on Market Chains and Their Suppliers
Newsletter Articles
The Effects of the Recent Decision by the Turkish Competition Board on Market Chains and Their Suppliers

During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...

Competition Law January 2022
On-Site Inspections in Light of the Recent Decisions of the Competition Authority
Newsletter Articles
On-Site Inspections in Light of the Recent Decisions of the Competition Authority

When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...

Competition Law December 2021
The European Commission Fines Banks for Participating in a Forex Cartel
Newsletter Articles
The European Commission Fines Banks for Participating in a Forex Cartel

The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...

Competition Law December 2021
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Newsletter Articles
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Competition Law November 2021
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 1: “Captain, an object is approaching”
Newsletter Articles
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 1: “Captain, an object is approaching”

Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...

Competition Law November 2021
Coca Cola’s Commitments in the Recent Competition Investigation
Newsletter Articles
Settlement Regulation Enters into Force
Newsletter Articles
Settlement Regulation Enters into Force
Competition Law July 2021
Competition Law Concerns Regarding Human Resources Practices
Newsletter Articles
The New Cartel Decision of the Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
The New Cartel Decision of the Competition Board
Competition Law September 2020
Amendments in the Law on the Protection of Competition
Newsletter Articles
Setting Legal Grounds for On-site Inspections
Newsletter Articles
Evaluation of COVID 19 Outbreak in Terms of Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The File of Sahibinden.com; A Phoenix Story
Newsletter Articles
The File of Sahibinden.com; A Phoenix Story
Competition Law February 2020
Final and Interim Decisions of the Turkish Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
Second Stage in Facebook File
Newsletter Articles
Second Stage in Facebook File
Competition Law September 2019
European Commission’s Foreign Exchange Spot Trading Cartel Decisions
Newsletter Articles
Expected Second Half of Competition Authority’s 12 Banks Decision
Newsletter Articles
Turkish Competition Board’s Sahibinden.com Decision
Newsletter Articles
Recent Developments in Abuse of Dominance Concerning Online Platforms
Newsletter Articles
New Horizons in Competition Law; Diesel Emissions Scandal
Newsletter Articles
Recent Developments in the Right of Access to Files
Newsletter Articles
Cards are being redistributed in the Turkish Beer Market
Newsletter Articles
The Recent Motor Vehicles Insurance Decision of the Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
Selective Distribution Systems under the Light of Coty Decision
Newsletter Articles
Competition Authority’s Sector Inquiry Report on Television Broadcasting
Newsletter Articles
Excessive Pricing
Newsletter Articles
Excessive Pricing
Competition Law June 2017
Amazon Decision and E-Book Commitments
Newsletter Articles
Amazon Decision and E-Book Commitments
Competition Law June 2017
Umbrella Effect within the Framework of Private Competition Enforcement
Newsletter Articles
Tüpraş Decision and the Rebate Systems
Newsletter Articles
Tüpraş Decision and the Rebate Systems
Competition Law September 2016
Important Reason in Terms Of Share Transfer Restrictions
Newsletter Articles
Booking.com Decision
Newsletter Articles
Booking.com Decision
Competition Law January 2017
Price / Margin Squeeze
Newsletter Articles
Price / Margin Squeeze
Competition Law November 2016
Recent Problems in Electricity Distribution Sector: ELDER Decision
Newsletter Articles
Intellectual Property Rights As Capital in Kind
Newsletter Articles
Right To Request Information Of The Shareholders in Joint Stock Companies
Newsletter Articles
Affected Market
Newsletter Articles
Affected Market
Competition Law August 2015

For creative legal solutions, please contact us.