The Regulation on Administrative Fines to be Imposed in Case of Competition Violations
The Regulation on Fines to Apply in Cases of Agreements, Concerted Practices and Decisions Limiting Competition, and Abuse of Dominant Position (Regulation on Fines) entered into force upon publication in the Official Gazette dated 27.12.2024 and numbered 32765. Through the Regulation on Fines, The Regulation on Fines to Apply in Cases of Agreements, Concerted Practices and Decisions Limiting Competition, and Abuse of Dominant Position published in the Official Gazette dated 05.02.2009, numbered 27142 (Former Regulation on Fines) was repealed.
The important amendments introduced by the Regulation on Fines are outlined below:
With the Regulation on Fines, the approach of determining the base fines within the scope of fixed rates has been abandoned. Under Articles 4 and 5 of the Regulation on Fines, the base fine rate to be imposed on undertakings and associations of undertakings or members of such associations shall be determined by the Board, separately for each violation, and the base fine rate shall be determined by increasing the initial fine rate according to the duration of the violation.
Under Article 5 of the Regulation on Fines, the initial fine rate is determined by considering the gravity of the damage that occurred or is likely to occur as a result of the violation and whether the nature of the violation is apparent and/or severe. The initial fine rate may be increased by at least one-fifth and at most one-fold depending on the duration of the violation.
Under Article 6 of the Regulation on Fines, the following circumstances are regulated as aggravating factors:
- Repeated violation of Article 4 and/or Article 6 of Law No. 4054 by the same undertaking or association of undertakings after the Board has determined that Article 4 and/or Article 6 of Law No. 4054 has been violated,
- Continuing the violation after the notification of the investigation decision,
- Having a decisive influence on the violation,
- Violation of the confidentiality obligation stipulated under Article 12/3 of the Regulation on Settlement Procedures Applicable in Investigations Regarding Agreements, Concerted Practices and Decisions Restricting Competition and Abuse of Dominant Position.
Under Article 6/3 of the Regulation on Fines, if the aggravating factors exist together, the rate of increase for each factor shall be added together and applied to the base fine rate.
Under Article 7 of the Regulation on Fines, the following circumstances are regulated as mitigating factors:
- Assisting the on-site inspection beyond the fulfillment of legal obligations, by providing physical and/or technical facilities that enable the on-site examination to be completed in a shorter time or to be carried out more effectively, submitting additional information or documents related to the inspection by the inspected undertakings themselves,
- Pressure by other undertakings into taking part in the violation,
- Limited participation in the violation,
- Violating activities’ insignificance within the annual gross revenues, and
- Having foreign sales revenues within the annual gross revenues subject to administrative fines.
The Regulation on Fines defines the concept of “decisive influence”. In this context, decisive influence refers to the indispensable function in the violation’s occurrence and/or maintenance.
Under Article 8 of the Regulation on Fines, if an administrative fine is imposed on an undertaking or association of undertakings, the managers or employees who have a decisive influence on the violation shall be imposed an administrative fine up to five percent of the fine imposed on the undertaking or association of undertakings.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
On 16.09.2024, the Competition Authority (Authority) published the Draft Guidelines on Competition Violations in Labor Markets (Draft Guidelines) and submitted it for public comment...
On 27.06.2017, the European Commission (Commission) imposed a fine of €2.4 billion on Google for abusing its dominant position in online search markets by favoring its own comparison shopping service...
The Competition Authority (Authority) has prepared five-year strategic plans since 2014. The Authority’s strategic plan for the period of 2024-2028 (Strategic Plan) has been published on 29.08.2024...
The annual report (Report) regarding the activities of the Turkish Competition Authority (Authority) for the year 2023 was published on the official website of the Authority. The Report examines the main elements of the Authority’s activities, strategic objectives, its mission and vision, its role in the national economy...
Law No. 7511 on Amendments to the Turkish Commercial Code and Certain Laws (Law) was published in the Official Gazette dated 29.05.2024 and numbered 32560. Law amended (Amendment) various articles of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (Law No. 4054). The relevant provisions of the Law...
The Protocol on Cooperation and Exchange of Information (Protocol) was signed between the Personal Data Protection Authority and the Competition Authority. The cooperation between the authorities aims to prevent practices that may harm both the privacy of personal data and the establishment of...
The Regulation on Foreign Subsidies Distorting the Internal Market (Regulation), which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU) dated 23.12.2022 and numbered L/330 entered into force on 12.01.2023, and became applicable as of 12.07.2023...
The Bundeskartellamt decided on June 26, 2023 that (Decision) several practices and contractual clauses used by the German national railway company Deutsche Bahn (DB) in relation to rival mobility platforms constitute an abuse of market power in the mobility services market...
Turkish Competition Board (Board) announced its final decision (Decision) as a result of the investigation conducted against certain undertakings through gentlemen’s agreement pursuant to the Board decisions dated 01.04.2021 and numbered 21-18/213-M, dated 05.08.2021 and numbered 21-37/527-M, dated...
In its judgment of July 4, 2023 (Decision), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that the national competition authorities may rely on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in their investigation in respect of abuse of dominant position...
The investigation initiated against DSM Grup Danışmanlık İletişim ve Satış Ticaret A.Ş. (Trendyol) with the Competition Board (Board) decision dated 23.09.2021 and numbered 21-44/650-M is concluded. In this context, the Board decided in its short decision (Decision) that...
The German Parliament (Bundestag) has adopted the 11th GWB amendment on July 6, 2023. (Wettbewerbsdurchsetzungsgesetz) After being approved by the Bundesrat, Germany’s second legislative body, the legislative procedure will be completed, approximately by the end of September. The amendment proposal...
The Constitutional Court (CC), in its decision dated 23.03.2023 and numbered 2019/40991 (CC Decision), stated that workplaces such as the headquarters, branches and facilities are considered as domicile within the scope of Article 21 of the Constitution and ruled that the competence granted to competition...
The Competition Authority presented its important studies on various sectors to the public. The reports, which address the competition law implications of the transformation in digital markets, and include findings and assessments on the fast-moving consumer goods retailing and online advertising sectors...
Through the Law No. 7440 on Restructuring of Certain Receivables and Amending Certain Laws (Law No. 7440) published in the Official Gazette dated 12.03.2023 and No. 32130, procedures and principles regarding restructuring of the certain public receivables are regulated...
The General Court of the European Union ("General Court") annulled the decision of the European Commission ("Commission"), which found that Qualcomm, the world's largest LTE baseband chipset (“chipset”) supplier, had abused its dominant position in the said market and imposed a fine of €997 million...
Turkish Competition Board (“The Board”), with its decision numbered 22-24/385-M has decided to initiate an investigation against DSM Grup Danışmanlık İletişim ve Satış Ticaret A.Ş. (“Trendyol”)...
European Commission adopted the new Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (“VBER”) accompanied by the New Vertical Guidelines on May 10, 2022. The new rules are simpler and clearer, which enables companies to assess the compatibility of...
Pursuant to the Communiqué Amending Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette...
Competition Authority Published the Guideline on Examining Digital Data During On-Site Inspections
Competition Board Decision regarding implementation of administrative fines for some banks due to not providing the information requested by the Competition Authority
Competition Board conditionally approved the Merger Transaction of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. and Peugeot S.A.
Competition Board initiated an Investigation against Facebook and Whatsapp
The Competition Board Rejected the Request for Exemption to the Agreement Between Johnson & Johnson and Pharmaceutical Warehouses
Competition Board's Interim Measure Decision on WhatsApp has been published
Competition Board's Investigation against Google concluded
Competition Board initiated an Investigation against 32 Undertakings concerning the Labor Market
The Decision of the Ankara 3rd Administrative Court Clarifying That Competition Board May Request Information and Documents from Undertakings Whose Headquarters Located Abroad by Notifying Their Subsidiaries in Turkey
The Regulation on Settlement is published
Significant Amendments are Introduced to the Block Exemption Communiqué on Vertical Agreements