Competition Board Decision regarding implementation of administrative fines for some banks due to not providing the information requested by the Competition Authority
In relation to preliminary investigation dated 17.01.2020 and numbered 20-05/48-M and with its decision dated 02.07.2020 and numbered 20-32/397-179, the Board imposed administrative monetary fines to five undertakings for not providing the information and documents requested by the Competition Authority.
According to the decision, with the first request for information under the scope of the preliminary investigation, all the correspondences of the traders made on Bloomberg and Reuters platforms between 01.01.2018-17.01.2020 were requested, and with the second request for information, all the records of the top 10 traders working at the United States of America and England with the highest TRY quoted transaction volume on Bloomberg and Reuters platforms were requested.
In addition, as expressed throughout the decision, Citibank A.Ş., Goldman Sachs TK Danışmanlık A.Ş., ING Bank A.Ş. and JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association Merkezi Colombus Ohio Istanbul Turkey Branch and Türkiye Garanti Bankası A.Ş. did not provide some of the requested information and documents to the Competition Authority, on the basis that (i) the transfer of the requested data may cause an infringement of GDPR, (ii) the requested information and documents were beyond the authority of the Board, (iii) the requested data was not under their control and that the notice should have been made to the parent company. The Board, on the other hand, did not accept the reasons that are stated above and stated that
- If it is not considered that the examination cannot be performed without the personal data in question, an anonymization with a detailed scope and reasoning which shall not exceed the personal data limits could be considered reasonable,
- The notification that is made to the parent company for being transferred to the subsidiary is valid,
- A statement of the subsidiary solely claiming that it does not have the related information or it does not have access to the related information will not be a reason to prevent implementation of sanctions.
To that end, pursuant to Article 16 of Law No 4054, the Board decided to impose an administrative fine to the undertakings which amounts to by one in thousand of their gross revenues at the end of fiscal year 2019, and also decided that the requested information shall be provided to the Competition Authority until 16.07.2020.
- You may access the full text of the Decision here.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The Protocol on Cooperation and Exchange of Information (Protocol) was signed between the Personal Data Protection Authority and the Competition Authority. The cooperation between the authorities aims to prevent practices that may harm both the privacy of personal data and the establishment of...
The Regulation on Foreign Subsidies Distorting the Internal Market (Regulation), which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU) dated 23.12.2022 and numbered L/330 entered into force on 12.01.2023, and became applicable as of 12.07.2023...
The Bundeskartellamt decided on June 26, 2023 that (Decision) several practices and contractual clauses used by the German national railway company Deutsche Bahn (DB) in relation to rival mobility platforms constitute an abuse of market power in the mobility services market...
Turkish Competition Board (Board) announced its final decision (Decision) as a result of the investigation conducted against certain undertakings through gentlemen’s agreement pursuant to the Board decisions dated 01.04.2021 and numbered 21-18/213-M, dated 05.08.2021 and numbered 21-37/527-M, dated...
In its judgment of July 4, 2023 (Decision), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that the national competition authorities may rely on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in their investigation in respect of abuse of dominant position...
The investigation initiated against DSM Grup Danışmanlık İletişim ve Satış Ticaret A.Ş. (Trendyol) with the Competition Board (Board) decision dated 23.09.2021 and numbered 21-44/650-M is concluded. In this context, the Board decided in its short decision (Decision) that...
The German Parliament (Bundestag) has adopted the 11th GWB amendment on July 6, 2023. (Wettbewerbsdurchsetzungsgesetz) After being approved by the Bundesrat, Germany’s second legislative body, the legislative procedure will be completed, approximately by the end of September. The amendment proposal...
The Constitutional Court (CC), in its decision dated 23.03.2023 and numbered 2019/40991 (CC Decision), stated that workplaces such as the headquarters, branches and facilities are considered as domicile within the scope of Article 21 of the Constitution and ruled that the competence granted to competition...
The Competition Authority presented its important studies on various sectors to the public. The reports, which address the competition law implications of the transformation in digital markets, and include findings and assessments on the fast-moving consumer goods retailing and online advertising sectors...
Through the Law No. 7440 on Restructuring of Certain Receivables and Amending Certain Laws (Law No. 7440) published in the Official Gazette dated 12.03.2023 and No. 32130, procedures and principles regarding restructuring of the certain public receivables are regulated...
The General Court of the European Union ("General Court") annulled the decision of the European Commission ("Commission"), which found that Qualcomm, the world's largest LTE baseband chipset (“chipset”) supplier, had abused its dominant position in the said market and imposed a fine of €997 million...
Turkish Competition Board (“The Board”), with its decision numbered 22-24/385-M has decided to initiate an investigation against DSM Grup Danışmanlık İletişim ve Satış Ticaret A.Ş. (“Trendyol”)...
European Commission adopted the new Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (“VBER”) accompanied by the New Vertical Guidelines on May 10, 2022. The new rules are simpler and clearer, which enables companies to assess the compatibility of...
Pursuant to the Communiqué Amending Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette...
Competition Authority Published the Guideline on Examining Digital Data During On-Site Inspections
Competition Board conditionally approved the Merger Transaction of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. and Peugeot S.A.
Competition Board initiated an Investigation against Facebook and Whatsapp
The Competition Board Rejected the Request for Exemption to the Agreement Between Johnson & Johnson and Pharmaceutical Warehouses
Competition Board's Interim Measure Decision on WhatsApp has been published
Competition Board's Investigation against Google concluded
Competition Board initiated an Investigation against 32 Undertakings concerning the Labor Market
The Decision of the Ankara 3rd Administrative Court Clarifying That Competition Board May Request Information and Documents from Undertakings Whose Headquarters Located Abroad by Notifying Their Subsidiaries in Turkey
The Regulation on Settlement is published
Significant Amendments are Introduced to the Block Exemption Communiqué on Vertical Agreements