Applicability of the Law No. 7440 in Terms of Administrative Fines Imposed by the Competition Board
Through the Law No. 7440 on Restructuring of Certain Receivables and Amending Certain Laws (Law No. 7440) published in the Official Gazette dated 12.03.2023 and No. 32130, procedures and principles regarding restructuring of the certain public receivables are regulated. Our client alert dated 24.03.2023 can be accessed here.
One of the public receivables included in the scope of the restructuring is the administrative fines for the periods before 31.12.2022. A significant part of the previous restructuring laws stipulated that administrative fines imposed by the Competition Board (Board) were outside the scope of the above-mentioned restructuring opportunity. However, the Law No. 7440 does not include such a provision. Therefore, administrative fines imposed by the Board within the scope of Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition are also included in this scope.
In addition, Article 3, paragraph 4 of Law No. 7440 regulates the restructuring of receivables at the litigation stage filed against administrative sanction decisions regarding administrative fines. In this respect, the following possibilities may be taken into consideration regarding the administrative fines imposed by the Board:
- In cases where an administrative fine is imposed on the undertaking by the Board’s short-form decision, but the reasoned decision has not yet been notified, the restructuring can be benefited from by paying %50 of the fine, since the period for filing a lawsuit against this decision has not yet expired. Even if it is questionable whether the restructuring can be benefited from in this scenario, we recommend making an application in order to avoid any loss of rights. In this context, it is considered that the Competition Authority is the authority where the restructuring application should be made pursuant to Article III-A-(ii) of the relevant Communiqué. However, in order to avoid any loss of rights, it would be beneficial to apply to the tax office simultaneously. In case the administration rejects the restructuring application, we believe that the matter may be brought before the court.
- Within 60 days following the notification of the Board’s reasoned decision regarding the administrative fine, a lawsuit can be filed before the administrative courts for the annulment of the decision. In cases where the above-mentioned period for filing a lawsuit has not yet expired, or in cases where a lawsuit has been filed but the court has not yet reached a decision, the restructuring can be benefited from by paying 50% of the fine.
- If a lawsuit has been filed against the reasoned decision of the Board regarding the administrative fine, and the latest decision is in favor of the taxpayer (cancellation), restructuring can be benefited from by paying %10 of the fine.
If the penalty amount to be paid according to the above-mentioned stages is paid together with the amount to be calculated based on the D-PPI monthly change rates instead of the secondary receivables applied to such penalties; the collection of the remaining penalties and all of the secondary receivables related to this receivable is waived by the administration.
Those who apply to benefit from the provisions of Law No. 7440 are required not to file a lawsuit or to withdraw the lawsuits filed.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The Protocol on Cooperation and Exchange of Information (Protocol) was signed between the Personal Data Protection Authority and the Competition Authority. The cooperation between the authorities aims to prevent practices that may harm both the privacy of personal data and the establishment of...
The Regulation on Foreign Subsidies Distorting the Internal Market (Regulation), which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU) dated 23.12.2022 and numbered L/330 entered into force on 12.01.2023, and became applicable as of 12.07.2023...
The Bundeskartellamt decided on June 26, 2023 that (Decision) several practices and contractual clauses used by the German national railway company Deutsche Bahn (DB) in relation to rival mobility platforms constitute an abuse of market power in the mobility services market...
Turkish Competition Board (Board) announced its final decision (Decision) as a result of the investigation conducted against certain undertakings through gentlemen’s agreement pursuant to the Board decisions dated 01.04.2021 and numbered 21-18/213-M, dated 05.08.2021 and numbered 21-37/527-M, dated...
In its judgment of July 4, 2023 (Decision), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that the national competition authorities may rely on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in their investigation in respect of abuse of dominant position...
The investigation initiated against DSM Grup Danışmanlık İletişim ve Satış Ticaret A.Ş. (Trendyol) with the Competition Board (Board) decision dated 23.09.2021 and numbered 21-44/650-M is concluded. In this context, the Board decided in its short decision (Decision) that...
The German Parliament (Bundestag) has adopted the 11th GWB amendment on July 6, 2023. (Wettbewerbsdurchsetzungsgesetz) After being approved by the Bundesrat, Germany’s second legislative body, the legislative procedure will be completed, approximately by the end of September. The amendment proposal...
The Constitutional Court (CC), in its decision dated 23.03.2023 and numbered 2019/40991 (CC Decision), stated that workplaces such as the headquarters, branches and facilities are considered as domicile within the scope of Article 21 of the Constitution and ruled that the competence granted to competition...
The Competition Authority presented its important studies on various sectors to the public. The reports, which address the competition law implications of the transformation in digital markets, and include findings and assessments on the fast-moving consumer goods retailing and online advertising sectors...
The General Court of the European Union ("General Court") annulled the decision of the European Commission ("Commission"), which found that Qualcomm, the world's largest LTE baseband chipset (“chipset”) supplier, had abused its dominant position in the said market and imposed a fine of €997 million...
Turkish Competition Board (“The Board”), with its decision numbered 22-24/385-M has decided to initiate an investigation against DSM Grup Danışmanlık İletişim ve Satış Ticaret A.Ş. (“Trendyol”)...
European Commission adopted the new Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (“VBER”) accompanied by the New Vertical Guidelines on May 10, 2022. The new rules are simpler and clearer, which enables companies to assess the compatibility of...
Pursuant to the Communiqué Amending Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette...
Competition Authority Published the Guideline on Examining Digital Data During On-Site Inspections
Competition Board Decision regarding implementation of administrative fines for some banks due to not providing the information requested by the Competition Authority
Competition Board conditionally approved the Merger Transaction of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. and Peugeot S.A.
Competition Board initiated an Investigation against Facebook and Whatsapp
The Competition Board Rejected the Request for Exemption to the Agreement Between Johnson & Johnson and Pharmaceutical Warehouses
Competition Board's Interim Measure Decision on WhatsApp has been published
Competition Board's Investigation against Google concluded
Competition Board initiated an Investigation against 32 Undertakings concerning the Labor Market
The Decision of the Ankara 3rd Administrative Court Clarifying That Competition Board May Request Information and Documents from Undertakings Whose Headquarters Located Abroad by Notifying Their Subsidiaries in Turkey
The Regulation on Settlement is published
Significant Amendments are Introduced to the Block Exemption Communiqué on Vertical Agreements