Previous Page  214 / 522 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 214 / 522 Next Page
Page Background

ICDR Rules

The ICDR Arbitration Rules

8

(as amended on 1 June 2010, “ICDR

Rules”) also provide for confidentiality obligations. The ICDR Rules,

at Art. 34, govern the duty of confidentiality of the arbitral tribunal and

the administrator, and Art. 27 regulates that an arbitral award may only

become public if the parties consent thereto, or if so required by law.

The ICRD Rules, therefore, imposes a duty of confidentiality on the

arbitrators and the administrators, thereby regulating the privacy of the

hearing.

In General

Numerous other arbitration rules also contain provisions govern-

ing confidentiality. However, the scope of confidentiality as foreseen

under arbitration rules is diverse. Different provisions are envisaged in

order to ensure confidentiality of the arbitral tribunal’s deliberations,

confidentiality of the hearings, or the confidentiality duty of the par-

ties. The LCIA Rules is regarded as a notable exception

9

where the

duty of confidentiality of the parties is expressly foreseen. Most arbi-

tration rules focus on the privacy of the hearing. The ICSID’s Rules of

Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings, to the contrary, does not include

provisions governing confidentiality.

As no institution must be involved in or notified of the dispute, ad

hoc arbitrations may be regarded as being more confidential than insti-

tutional arbitrations

10

. However, it is difficult to envisage an arbitration

institution disclosing confidential information. To the contrary, in light

of the rules assessed above, institutional arbitration may appear to pro-

vide for a broader scope of confidentiality.

Regardless of the scholar’s discussions on whether the duty of con-

fidentiality is inherent in arbitration, the regulatory framework under

198

NEWSLETTER 2015

8

For the full text, please see

http://www.internationalarbitrationlaw.com/icdr-arbitration-rules/

(accessed on 27 April 2015).

9

Arbitration World, Jurisdictional Comparisons, Ed. Karyl Nairn and Patrich Heneghan,

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher Flom (UK) LLP, 4

th

Edition,

Global Overview

,

Constantine

Partasides

and

Greg Fullelove

, p. 9.

10

Michael McIlwrath

,

John Savage

, International Arbitration and Mediation, A Practical Guide,

Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, para. 1-144.