Pros and Cons – Discussions on Third Party Funders
In General
Third party financing enables parties to initiate their meritorious
claims without concern over scarcity of their finances. It is argued that
third party financing is favorable and beneficial since it promotes
access to justice for parties who financially cannot support a dispute,
enables them to maintain their cash flows, and pursue their claims.
However, the increase of third party funders’ presence in arbitra-
tion has resulted in numerous discussions and concerns. The main con-
cerns are governing impartiality and independence of arbitrators, and
the necessity of security for costs
4
; which are briefly assessed, below.
Furthermore, it may be argued that the mere existence of financ-
ing, or the denial of financing, may result in bias as to whether or not
a claim is meritorious. The funders engage in a thorough analysis of a
case they are asked to finance; therefore, their choice of whether or not
to finance a party may affect how a claim is regarded by third persons
(for instance, the arbitrators). On the other hand, a party may also
request a case assessment by a potential funder prior to initiating its
claim. This way, if rejected by a funder, a party who decides to not ini-
tiate its claim may be spared unnecessary legal costs, which is consid-
ered practical and/or favorable
5
.
Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators
In international arbitration, the lack of impartiality and indepen-
dence of an arbitrator may have severe consequences, such as the chal-
lenge and/or annulment of an award. Arbitration rules enable and gov-
ern procedures for the challenge of an arbitrator. Further, if and once
an award is rendered, lack of impartiality or independence may prevent
ARBITRATION LAW
201
4
For further information please see
Carlos González-Bueno
and
Laura Lozano
, Third Party
Funding Again Under the Spotlight
http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2014/10/08/third-party-funding-again-under-the-spotlight/ (accessed on 18 September 2015).
5
For further assessment on the impact of third party funders on the parties whose financing
requests have been denied, please see
Victoria A. Shannon
, The Impact of Third-Party Funders
on the Parties They Decline to Finance,
http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2015/07/06/the-impact-of-third-party-funders-on-the-parties-they-decline-to-finance/ (accessed on 22
September 2015).