data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e410/8e4101b3c957a3c4e06411d5cdb7b92735b81d99" alt="Show Menu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b415/7b41572cde739e741cfe71e35cb7e518eb945b4c" alt="Page Background"
The final document certifying the insufficiency of the pledge only
states that the debt was not covered with the pledged, whereas the cer-
tificate of insolvency states that the entire property of the debtor is not
sufficient to cover the debt. For this reason, the final document certi-
fying the insufficiency of the pledge does not bear the advantages of
the certificate of insolvency.
Conclusion
The procedure of the liquidation of the pledged movables materi-
ally coincides with the general seizure proceedings. However, certain
differences arising due to the presence of a pledge, for instance the
obligation of primary application to the pledged property, are impor-
tant. The absence of a seizure phase in the procedure for the liquida-
tion of the pledged movables stands out as the most material differ-
ence. Nevertheless, the process of sale of the pledged property and the
distribution of the considerations are widely similar with the general
seizure proceedings.
226
NEWSLETTER 2012