Previous Page  163 / 516 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 163 / 516 Next Page
Page Background

Rebates Systems

Rebates systems are defined as changes in pricing applications for

the buyers implied by the undertakings operating at different levels of

the production or distribution chain

4

.

Rebates systems are classified in several ways in practice and by

scholars. In this article, we will base on the effects of the rebates with

regard to the abuse of dominant position.

Rebates Systems Which Are Considered as Abusive

First one of these types of rebates is fidelity rebates, (or loyalty

discounts) which conduct the buyers to supply their entire needs from

one undertaking. The undertaking in dominant position provides fideli-

ty rebates on condition that the buyer supplies the entire or an impor-

tant part of its needs from the relevant undertaking

5

.

Second type of rebates, which are considered as abusive are the

target rebates. Target rebates imply targets related to the future fore-

casted needs of buyers or targets which are independent from the buy-

ers’ needs

6

.

In this context, the undertaking in dominant position assures its

supply of products. On the other hand, it guarantees buyers’ fidelity

and complicates and restricts the activities of competing undertakings

while preventing potential new entrants to the market hereby.

Rebates Systems Which Are Considered as Legal

In principle, quantity discounts are not considered as abusive in

Competition law, because the quantity discounts are not provided for

purchase in a specific period. Quantity rebates are only related to the

purchase from the supplier, are applied to entire buyers and provided

objectively regarding the amount of the purchase. Hence, two buyers,

who purchase the same amount of products, acquire equal rebates.

COMPETITION LAW

149

4

Kocabaş

, ibid, p. 5.

5

Görgülü, Ümit

,

Hâkim Durumun Kötüye Kullanılması Kapsamında Fiyat Ayrımcılığı

Uygulamaları,

Rekabet Kurumu Uzmanlık Tezleri Serisi No: 32, Ankara, 2003, p. 17.

6

Kocabaş

,

ibid, p. 9.