Previous Page  351 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 351 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

MISCELLANEOUS

337

Board in respect of the appeals referred herein above at the competent

court within a period of two months beginning from notification of the

decision. Therefore, there shall be a decision of Re-examination and

Evaluation Board and it shall be final. The two months period is a lapse

of time. If this period is elapsed, then the lawsuit shall be dismissed.

The lawsuits against the TPI decisions shall be initiated at the judicial

courts. Article 71 of Decree Law no 556 envisages special courts for the

lawsuits to be initiated within the frame of Decree Law no 556 as the

competent courts. Ankara special court shall be competent and have

jurisdiction for the lawsuits initiated in respect of the TPI’s decisions

within the frame of Decree Law no 556 and for the lawsuits initiated

against the TPI by a third party who is damaged as a result of the decision

of the TPI.

The lawsuit shall be initiated in respect of cancellation of the decision

on refusal of registration application or cancellation of the decision on

refusal of the objection made regarding the registration application.

If the person whose application is refused on the absolute grounds for

refusal for registry of a trademark, which are listed in article 7 of Decree

Law no 556, does not receive a favorable result from TPI to its appeal;

may initiate a lawsuit before competent courts within the prescription

time. If the court decides that there shall not exist any absolute grounds

for refusal for registry, then upon becoming final and binding of the

court decision, no obstruction shall deemed to be existing with respect to

absolute grounds for refusal for application of a trademark registration.

In this case, objections may be made based only on the facts of relative

grounds for refusal for registration of a trademark objection

.

The person, who has objected to the decision on trademark registration

on the basis of relative grounds for refusal which are listed in article 8 of

Decree Law no 556, shall be entitled to initiate a lawsuit if his objection is

refused by TPI. If the court does not find the relative grounds for refusal

justified and dismiss the lawsuit, then no objection may be made to the

trademark registration application based on relative grounds for refusal.

In lawsuits initiated against TPI, the claimant shall be the person

whose objection or application is refused by TPI. The defendant shall be

TPI Directorate.