Previous Page  347 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 347 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

MISCELLANEOUS

333

Any legal transaction to be executed by only one spouse

regarding such an important asset may be against the benefit

of the other spouse. Therefore, pursuant to article 194 of the

Turkish Civil Code numbered 4721, the transfer of the ownership

of a family house is subject to the consent of the other spouse.

In other words, the transfer of the ownership of a family house

is a legal transaction which requires the consent of the other

spouse. (Bilge ÖZTAN, Aile Hukuku, Ankara-2004, p. 207; Ahmet

M. KILIÇOGLU, Türk Medeni Kanunu’nda Diğer Eşin Rızasına

Bağlı Hukuksal İşlemler ve Yasal Alım Hakkı, Ankara-2002, p. 18 )

It is provided in subparagraph III of article 194 of the Turkish

Civil Code numbered 4721 that a family house annotation

can be put onto the title deed registry in order to prevent legal

transactions without receiving consent. However, the aforesaid

article is not an exception to the rule of trust in the title deed

records. ( KILIÇOĞLU, p. 20 )

If the other spouse failed to demand the relevant annotation

to be put onto the title deed registry, the right of the third party,

who acted with good faith in the legal transaction with the spouse

who owns the house, will be protected in accordance with article

1023 of the Turkish Civil Code numbered 4721.

On the other hand, annotation will render legal transactions

void despite the third party’s good faith. Therefore, the decision

of the local court stating that the restriction on transaction

of the ownership will arise by annotation, in other words, the

annotation is a “founding annotation” and thus the right of the

third party will be deemed as valid without considering whether

the third party is in good faith, is found to be inaccurate.

As it is known, article 1023 of the Turkish Civil Code

numbered 4721 stipulates the rule of trust in the title deed

records. The subparagraph III of article 194 of the Turkish Civil

Code numbered 4721 indicates that this rule is maintained.

(KILIÇOĞLU, p. 20)”

As it is understood from the above decision, the Assembly of Civil

Chambers of the Court of Appeal is in the opinion that the family house