Previous Page  65 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 65 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

COMMERC I AL LAW

51

one year will be extended for 3 years if new members are

not elected (TCC art. 314/1), and this situation means

circumventing the provisions for agency and contradict

the purpose of art. 397/2 of the Code of Obligations.

In case a competence is granted for a definite term or

for 3 months with a temporary registry pursuant to art.

34/4 of TCC, if the new members are not elected by the

end of this term, the result may not change and the same

gap will continue. To grant a limited competence would

not be valid according to art. 321/1 and 321/2 and will

have also the abovementioned disadvantages. To accept

that the former members will continue their duties until

the new members are elected gives former members the

opportunity to delay the election of board members until

the last possible moment. Moreover, these members will

not act prudently in conducting the affairs of company

since they are acting temporarily.

In this case, it is more acceptable to decide that the

company no longer has its organ pursuant to art. 435/1 of

TCC. Despite the fact that there is a risk that the company

will be terminated because the election of new members is

not effectuated until the time granted by the judge for the

election of members, this disadvantage may be remedied

by the court’s granting a long and appropriate term..”

However, in general, the decisions of the Court of Appeals accept that

as the TCC does not have any provision stipulating that the duties of board

members are terminated automatically at the end of their terms, the former

members of board will continue their duties until the new ones are elected.

It is not possible to mention a lack of organ in the company due to the

expiration of the term of office of board members.

To present the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the decision of the 11

th

Chamber numbered 2009/5463-2009/6666 and dated 01.06.2009 may be

given as an example:

“Concerning joint stock companies, there is no provision

stipulating that the duties of boardmembers are terminated

automatically at the end of their terms and because of