352 / 391
NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0
338
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination made upon
the claim that BOTAŞ Boru Hatları ile Petrol Taşıma A.Ş abused
its dominant position by means of complicating the activities of
the undertaking and causing discrimination by unfairly ceasing to
provide natural gas to BİS Enerji Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. needed for
generation, which operated in the area of electricity generation and
sales, decided that an investigation was not required to be opened
in accordance with Act No. 4054. (14.10.2010; 10-65/ 1372-510)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination made upon
the claim that
de facto
exclusivity was caused in the market for
carbonated beverage through practices like quota commitment,
no-cost product, and payment of a particular amount included in
contracts Coca Cola Satış ve Dağıtım A.Ş. (Coca Cola Sales and
Distribution Inc.) and/or its dealers concluded with the final points
of sale, decided that an investigation was not required to be opened
in accordance with Act No. 4054. (14.10.2010; 10-65/ 1363-505)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination made
upon the claim that the vertical relation between Azgınoğlu
Petrol Ürünleri Nakliyat İnş. Zir. San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. and OPET
Petrolcülük A.Ş. was contrary to Act No. 4054 and Communiqué
No. 2002/2, decided that an investigation was not required to be
opened in accordance with article 41 of Act No. 4054. (14.10.2010;
10-65/ 1373-511)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination made upon
the claim that TNT International Express Taşımacılık Ticaret
Ltd. Şti., DHL Worldwide Express Taşımacılık Ticaret A.Ş., and
United Parcel Service Ünspet Paket Servisi ve Ticaret A.Ş. signed
agreements with provisions infringing Act no 4054 and engaged
in practices aimed at eliminating competition within the cargo
transportation market, decided that an investigation was not required
to be opened in accordance with Act No. 4054. (21.10.2010; 10-
66/1405-526)
•
The CompetitionBoard, as a result of the examinationmade upon the
claim that Kayserigaz Kayseri Doğalgaz Dağıtım Paz. ve Tic. A.Ş.
abused its dominant position by means of effectuating calculations