Previous Page  353 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 353 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

MONTHLY LEGAL DEVELOPMENT S

339

that infringe EPDK Communiqués on subscriber connection fees,

decided that an investigation was not required to be opened in

accordance with Act No. 4054. (21.10.2010; 10-66/1401-522)

The Competition Board, as a result of the examination made upon

the claim that the usufruct and dealership contracts signed by Pet-

Or Salıpazarı Petrol Orman Ürünleri Nakliyat İnşaat Tic. Ltd. Şti.

and Petrol Ofisi A.Ş. were contrary to Communiqué No. 2002/2,

decided that concerning the vertical agreement consisting of the

liquid fuel dealership contract, protocol, and the formal deed of

usufruct rights, thewill of the partieswas renewedwith the dealership

contract dated 01.05.2006, the protocol dated 07.09.2006, and the

establishment of usufruct rights on 03.08.2006, and that the vertical

agreement was within the scope of the block exemption for 5 years

following the dealership contract of 01.05.2006. (27.10.2010; 10-

67/1419-536)

The Competition Board, as a result of the evaluation made upon the

request that the price policy which Domino’s Pizza Restaurantları

A.Ş. (Domino’s Pizza Restaurants Inc.) applied within a period of

one week be examined within the scope of Act No. 4054 on the

Protection of Competition and that due action be taken, decided

that no investigation need be opened under Act No. 4054, and the

complaint was dismissed. (04.11.2010; 10-69/1458-557)

The Competition Board, as a result of the examination conducted

based on the claims that the prices of plans and text messages

have been increased and pricing periods have been extended by

GSM operators collusively, decided that no investigation need to

be opened under Act No. 4054, and the complaint was dismissed.

(04.11.2010; 10-69/1451-551)

The Competition Board, as a result of the examination conducted

based on the request that a negative clearance document be given to

the transaction allowing the retail-level internet service provided by

TTNet A.Ş. (TTNet Inc.), an affiliate of Türk Telekomünikasyon

A.Ş. (Turk Telecom Inc.), and at the same time be provided by Türk

Telekomünikasyon A.Ş., decided that the transaction allowing the

retail-level internet access service currently provided by TTNet

A.Ş., an affiliate of Türk Telekomünikasyon A.Ş., and at the same