339 / 391
MONTHLY LEGAL DEVELOPMENT S
325
A.Ş. and Boyner Büyük Mağazacılık A.Ş., Samsonite branded
products were sold for the same price and the prices in question
were quite high as compared with the same products’ prices abroad,
decided that opening an investigation in accordance with article 41
of the Act No. 4054 was not relevant and that the complaint be
rejected. (04.03.2010; 10-21/273-101)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination made upon
the claim that Turkcell İletişim Hizmetleri A.Ş. set certain intra-
network tariffs below the fee of interconnection it provided to
the other GSM operators as an input and in this context abused
its dominant position
via
price squeeze, decided that opening an
investigation against Turkcell İletişimHizmetleri A.Ş. in accordance
with article 41 of the Act No. 4054 was not required and that the
complaint be rejected. (04.03.2010; 10-21/271-100)
•
The message of the Competition Authority President Prof. Dr.
Nurettin KALDIRIMCI for the 13
th
anniversary of the foundation
of the Competition Authority was published on the official website
of the Competition Authority on 05.03.2010.
•
The 41st issue of the Competition Journal was published on the
official website of the Competition Board on 08.03.2010.
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination made for
purposes of detecting whether the existing structures and activities
of formations that made measurement as to advertisement conduits
other than TİAK infringed the Act No. 4054, decided that an
investigation against the Radio Monitorization Research Board and
Interactive Advertising Bureau Turkey Interactive Advertisement
Platform was not required in accordance with article 41 of the Act
No. 4054. (11.03.2010; 10-22/303-111)
•
The 11
th
Research Bulletin Issue (June 2009) was published on the
official website of the Competition Authority on 12.03.2010.
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination performed
upon the request to allow Bimpaş Bira ve Meşrubat Pazarlama
A.Ş. and its dealers and distributors to benefit from the exemption
granted within the scope of the Block Exemption Communiqué on
Vertical Agreements No. 2002/2, decided to grant an individual
exemption, under article 5 of the Act No. 4054, to single brand