NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0
324
Ltd. Şti. infringed Act No. 4054 in the granisetron tenders opened by
SSK (Social Security Institution), state and university hospitals in
2003, the case has been reevaluated. As a result of the reevaluation
made from the perspective of Roche Müstahzarları San. Tic. A.Ş.
and Beşer Ecza Deposu Tic. ve San. Ltd. Şti., it has been decided
that the above-mentioned behaviour resulted in the prevention of
competition and falls under Article 4 of the Act No. 4054; that
Roche Müstahzarları San. Tic. A.Ş. and Beşer Ecza Deposu Tic. ve
San. Ltd. Şti. will be penalized in accordance with Article 16; and
that the aforementioned undertakings will be given administrative
fines at discretion of 1% of their net sales generated in 2002, which
amounts to 3,505,784.18 TL for Roche Müstahzarları San. Tic.
A.Ş. and 404,768.67 TL for Beşer Ecza Deposu Tic. ve San. Ltd.
Şti. (18.02.2010; 10-18; 207-78)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination conducted
based on the claim that British American Tobacco Türkiye A.Ş.
infringed competition by not providing Kent- and Polo-branded
products to an undertaking that did not accept to use its promotion
shelf, decided that there is no need to open an investigation under
Article 41 of the Act No. 4054, and the complaint is thus dismissed.
(18.02.2010; 10-18/199-75)
•
It has been decided that the “Investment Support Agreement” to
be signed between Mey İçki Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. and the final
points of sale will be given a negative clearance document since
the Agreement does not include any provision limiting competition
under Articles 4, 6, and 7 of the Act No.4054. (25.02.2010; 239-93)
•
The Competition Board decided [with regard to] the transaction
of acquisition by Alstom Power ve Ulaşım A.Ş. of Alstom Power
Proje A.Ş. with all of its assets and liabilities which were in the
same economic entity that the transaction did not fall under article
7 of the Act No. 4054 and the Communiqué No. 1997/1 due to the
fact that the parties were within the same economic entity and that
a negative clearance certificate be provided to the transaction under
article 8 of the Act No. 4054. (04.03.2010; 10-21/264-97)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination made upon
the claim that in those stores belonging to Desa Deri San. ve Tic.