344 / 391
NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0
330
for SIM card, prepaid card, digital airtime minutes, activation and
other subscriber services through
de facto
exclusive practices
and complicated the operations of Vodafone Telekomünikasyon
A.Ş., and on the request for interim measures, decided that the
aforementioned claims should be assessed under the ongoing
investigation initiated with the Competition Board decision dated
11.11.2009 and numbered 09-54/1289-M and that the request of
the aforementioned undertaking for interim measures should be
rejected at this stage. (27.05.2010; 10-38/659-226)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination made upon
the request for the issuance of a negative clearance certificate to
the “Waste Motor Oil Delivery and Refinement and Regeneration
Contract” concluded between the Petroleum Industrial Association
Economic Enterprise and Refinement & Regeneration facilities,
decided to give a negative clearance certificate to the contract cited
in accordance with article 8 of the Act No. 4054. (10.06.2010; 10-
42; 730-237)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination made upon
the claim that Milangaz LPG itself made sales at low prices under
the name of its dealer and main dealer in Kırıkkale, decided that it
was not necessary to open an investigation in accordance with article
41 of the Act No. 4054 and rejected the complaint. (10.06.2010; 10-
42/732-239)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the reassessment made due
to the overruling by the Council of State of the Board decision
taken on 15.11.2007 with regard to the claim that Ankara Halk
Ekmek ve Un Fabrikası A.Ş. controlled by the Ankara Metropolitan
Municipality committed competition-distorting activities in the
bread production market through bread-selling kiosks to which it
had given the right to operate, decided that it was not necessary to
open an investigation in accordance with article 41 of the Act No.
4054 and rejected the complaint. (10.06.2010; 10-42/717-230)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination performed
upon the cliam that Net Ankara Telekomünikasyon Elektronik ve
Bilgisayar Teknolojileri A.Ş. could not receive call termination
service from Turkcell İletişim Hizmetleri A.Ş. and Vodafone