336 / 391
NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0
322
The complainant alleged that Doğan Dağıtım Satış Pazarlama ve
Matbaacılık A.Ş. exerted pressure on its main dealers regarding the
sale of non-media products. It was decided that there is no need for
an investigation to be opened under Article 41 of the Act No. 4054.
Thus, the complaint was dismissed. (04.02.2010; 10-13/140-60)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination conducted
based on the claim that Lider Gıda Sanayi A.Ş. applies predatory
pricing, decided that there is no need for an investigation to be
opened under Article 41 of the Act No. 4054. (04.02.2010; 146-62)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination conducted
based on the request that a negative clearance document be given or
an exemption be granted to the “Waste Oil Management Protocol”
(“Protocol”) signed between Petrol Sanayi Derneği İktisadi
İşletmesi and those undertakings that produce their own lube oil,
market it with their own brand, and import it or that are liable
to collect and dispose of the lube oil contained in their vehicles
imported from abroad, decided that a negative clearance document
may not be given since the Protocol falls under Article 4 of the Act
No. 4054. However, the Protocol contained in the application will
be given an individual exemption since it has become clear that
in anticipation of the amendment to be made in 2010 the Protocol
fulfils the exemption conditions under Article 5 of the Act No.
4054. (04.02.2010; 10-13; 130-50)
•
The Competition Board, as a result of the examination conducted
based on the request that a negative clearance document be given
or an exemption be granted to the “Sales Contract” (“Contract”)
concluded between Arçelik A.Ş. and Sony Eurasia Pazarlama
A.Ş., decided that the Contract may not be given a negative
clearance document since it falls under Article 4 of the Act No.
4054 as regards the markets for LCD TV and laptop computers.
However, the contract affected by the notification will be granted
an individual exemption for the duration of the contract since all
of the conditions under Article 5 of the Act No. 4054 are present.
(04.02.2010; 10-13/145-61)
•
The investigation initiated by the Competition Board on 23.10.2008
against İzocamTicaret ve Sanayi A.Ş. (“İzocam”) has been finalized