UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial
Arbitration
With the amendments made in 2006, the UNCITRAL Model Law
on International Commercial Arbitration (“Model Law”) covers the
enforcement of interim measures, under Article 17 H. The relevant arti-
cle sets forth that an interim measure issued by an arbitral tribunal shall
be recognized as binding and, unless otherwise provided by the arbi-
tral tribunal, enforced upon application to the competent court, irre-
spective of the country in which it was issued, subject to the provisions
of Article 17 I
8
.
Additionally, the Model Law, under Article 17 I, provides for the
grounds to refuse recognition or enforcement of interim measures. The
Model Law also emphasizes that these conditions are intended to limit
the circumstances in which national courts may refuse to enforce an
interim measure, and the states may adopt fewer circumstances in
which enforcement may be refused by the national courts.
Conclusion
The enforcement of arbitrator-granted interim or conservatory
measures is worth analyzing, based on the absence of harmonized
solutions on the issue. The application of the NewYork Convention for
the enforcement of these measures is controversial, both among nation-
al courts and commentators. The Model Law suggests that states adopt
national law provisions, which would permit the enforcement of these
measures by national courts. Even though there is no harmonized solu-
tion for the problem of arbitrators’ lack of coercive powers, the parties
tend to abide by the measures, since it would give a negative message
to the arbitrators when a decision on the merits is pending.
ARBITRATION LAW
215
8
UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, with amendments as adopt-
ed in 2006. Source:
http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/07-86998_Ebook.pdf.