Previous Page  225 / 522 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 225 / 522 Next Page
Page Background

Incorrect Ruling of the Arbitrators Regarding their Competence

or Incompetence

In accordance with Art. (7)(h) of the IAA, the arbitrators may give

rulings regarding their own competences (

competence-competence

).

Accordingly, the objection asserted by the parties regarding the incom-

petence shall be examined as a preliminary question. Wrong /unlawful

decisions rendered as a consequence of this examination shall also

constitute a reason to set aside.

Arbitrators Ruling on a Matter Falling outside of the Scope of

the Arbitration Agreement or not Ruling for All Matters Set

Forth in The Claims of the Parties or Exceeding Their Authority

Arbitrators shall only decide on matters that fall within the scope

of the arbitration agreement. If there is a restriction in the arbitration

agreement in this regard, the arbitrators are obliged to comply. The part

of the award incompetently ruled by the arbitrators shall be set aside to

the degree that it can be separated from the award; the competently

ruled part thereof shall be deemed valid.

The arbitrators are obliged to render an award in reference to the

claims of both parties; thus, disregarding such claims shall also consti-

tute a reason to set aside. If the arbitrators do not give a decision on

certain claims, the parties may ask for a supplementary award.

In cases where the parties have determined the rules to be applied

to the arbitration proceedings, the arbitrators are obliged to comply

with such rules. Otherwise, it shall mean that the arbitrators have

exceeded their authority. Within this context, the authority of the arbi-

trators shall be restricted by the arbitration agreement and the agree-

ment between the parties.

Inconformity of the Arbitral Proceeding with the Procedure

In accordance with Art. 15(A)(1)(f) of the IAA, unless there is an

agreement between the parties, in order for an arbitral award to be set

aside, this will depend on the fact that the arbitral proceedings have

been carried out inconsistently with the provisions of the IAA, and that

this inconsistency affects the merits of the award. The parties are free

to determine the rules to be applied to the procedure of the proceed-

ARBITRATION LAW

209