Previous Page  182 / 522 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 182 / 522 Next Page
Page Background

wording covering these matters in the arbitration agreement, as the

burden concerning these subjects will fall on the party that is unsuc-

cessful.

Parties can set Qualifications for Arbitrators

The parties can agree on certain professional experience, national-

ity, and any other qualifications they deem to be necessary. Excessive

qualifications will create difficulties in the selection of arbitrators.

Parties can set Time Limits in the Arbitration Agreement

Most of the institutional rules provide time limits. For example,

Article 30 of the ICC Rules regulates six months for the arbitral tri-

bunal to render the award with a possible extension. The arbitral tri-

bunal should be allowed to extend these time limits to avoid challenges

and enforcement problems.

It is difficult for the parties to ascertain during the drafting period

whether a particular resolution can be rendered within specific time

requirements. If the award is not rendered within the provided period,

there can be enforcement problems.

Finality of the Arbitration

Most of the arbitration rules provide regulations with respect to the

finality of the arbitration . If the parties do not choose a set of arbitra-

tion

3

rules, it is important to state in the arbitration agreement that the

award is final and not subject to recourse. In adding such language, the

parties should examine the law of the seat of arbitration to see the

scope of the waiver, and the language required under the law of the seat

of arbitration.

Conclusion

The will of the parties is the constitutive element of an arbitration

agreement. This will should be clear. The selection between ad hoc or

institutional arbitration shall be made in accordance with the particu-

166

NEWSLETTER 2015

3

See ICC Rules Article 34 (6).