Previous Page  179 / 522 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 179 / 522 Next Page
Page Background

Parties should select the Place of Arbitration

In making such determination, the parties should consider strate-

gic, practical, and legal criteria. The strategic criteria cover neutrality

and effectiveness. In practice, neutrality is guaranteed by selecting the

seat of the arbitration to be in a country that is not connected to any of

the parties. Effectiveness is related to the enforcement of the award.

Practical criteria highlights comfort, security, practical conditions

to carry out arbitration activities, costs, hearing facilities, closeness to

the parties, witnesses and evidence, etc.

In general terms, the place of arbitration determines intervention of

the courts and applicable procedural law. There is a natural relationship

between the “place of arbitration” and the “applicable procedural law.”

The applicable procedural law is the law of the place of arbitration

unless the parties agree to another procedural law. The parties should

be careful when selecting a place of arbitration to consider the proce-

dural law and courts’ position towards arbitration. The place of arbi-

tration, or the seat, is significant in terms of the award. It provides

“nationality” to the award. The nationality of the award may be signif-

icant for the enforcement of the award, since the NewYork Convention

enables the signatories to make a reciprocity reservation.

The institutional rules generally provide that the award is deemed

to be made at the place of arbitration. An award is described as “for-

eign” when it is rendered in a country different than the country in

which it is to be enforced.

In the absence of an agreement between the parties, the place of

arbitration is either fixed by the relevant institution or the arbitrators

2

.

The place of arbitration, which is a legal concept, does not provide that

all procedural acts that include hearings be held in the determined city

or country (the seat). The location of hearings may be different. The

arbitral tribunal may, after consultation with the parties, conduct hear-

ings and meetings at any location it considers appropriate, unless oth-

erwise agreed by the parties. In ad hoc arbitrations, Article 18 of the

UNCITRAL Rules provide a similar approach.

ARBITRATION LAW

163

2

See Article 18 of the ICC Rules.