EU competition law is part of the public policy of the EU member
States, and arbitral tribunal shall apply ex officio the relevant rules
even if it wasn’t raise by any of the parties. Otherwise, contrariety to
the EU competition law constitutes a ground for the refusal of the
enforcement of the relevant arbitral award on the basis of inconsisten-
cy with the public policy. Additionally, national courts may refer to the
European Court of Justice (“ECJ”), if necessary, in order to determine
the inconsistency of the award with the EU competition law. In con-
formity with Eco Swiss and other relevant cases, the arbitrability of the
competition disputes is accepted under the EU law, and arbitral awards
may be refused to be enforced on grounds of inconsistency with the
public policy in case they contradicts with the EU competition law. It
should be noted that the courts should refuse the enforcement of the
award when the objectives of the competition law is truly jeopardized,
and should adopt a minimalist position regarding the control of the
arbitral awards
7
.
A recent decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal
8
may be a guide
for the future practice in Turkish law. The Court concluded that the EU
law or Spanish law doesn’t preclude the arbitrability of the competition
disputes as long as the relevant award applied the mandatory competi-
tion rules. Contrary to the Swiss law
9
setting forth the arbitrability of
the disputes having pecuniary nature, The Spanish law provides that
disputes of which the subject matter is at free disposition of the parties
are arbitrable. Therefore, competition law claims are deemed as at free
disposition of the parties under certain jurisdictions. Accordingly, the
decision of the Madrid Court of Appeal should be considered while
determining the arbitrability under Turkish law since the Law No. 4686
118
NEWSLETTER 2015
7
OECD, Arbitration and Competition, related to a hearing on Arbitration and Competition,
Working Party No.3 meeting of 26 October 2010, p. 13.
Please see:
http://www.oecd.org/competition/abuse/49294392.pdf(Access Date: 04.12.2015)
8
Auto no. 147/2013, of 18 October 2013.
9
Article 177 of Loi fédérale sur le Droit International Privé (Federal Statue on International
Private Law).
Please see:
https://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classified-compilation/19870312/index.htmlFor English text please see:
https://www.swissarbitration.org/sa/download/IPRG_english.pdf(Access Date: 04.12.2015).