Previous Page  129 / 522 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 129 / 522 Next Page
Page Background

This provision does not prohibit an undertaking being in a domi-

nant position. An undertaking might become dominant solely through

its own dynamics and success. The intended prohibition is the domi-

nant position of an undertaking that is achieved without relying on the

current efficiency of the established capacity

6

. Undertakings in domi-

nant positions might perform concentration transactions; yet, the

undertaking with a dominant position shall not significantly lessen

competition with the aim to strengthen its dominant position.

The kinds of mergers and acquisitions subject to the Competition

Board’s (“Board”) authorization are stipulated under the Communiqué.

Each concentration shall be subject to the Board’s supervision or

control. The mergers and acquisitions that are subject, or not, to the

Board’s authorization are explicitly set forth in the Communiqué.

Concentrations Subject, and not Subject to, the Board’s

Authorization

In order for a merger or an acquisition to take place, there must be

two independent undertakings. If a merger occurs with two dependent

companies, namely, companies in the same group, such transaction

shall not be considered as a merger, nor as an acquisition, in terms of

the competition law.

7

Thus, such types of mergers shall not require

authorization.

Article 6 of the Communiqué stipulates the transactions that are

not deemed as a merger or an acquisition. In accordance with the

Communiqué, intra-group transactions that do not lead to a change of

control shall not subject to the Board’s authorization. The significant

matter here is the event of change of control following a merger or

acquisition. If the control of an undertaking or a company remains the

same following the transfer of its shares, in other words, if only the

minority shares are transferred, then such transaction shall not be con-

sidered as a merger or acquisition as per the competition law and, thus,

shall not be subject to authorization

8

.

COMPETITION LAW

113

6

ASLAN, Yilmaz

, Rekabet Hukuku Dersleri, 2014, p. 212.

7

ASLAN, Yilmaz

, Rekabet Hukuku Dersleri, 2014, p. 213.

8

ASLAN, Yilmaz

, Rekabet Hukuku Dersleri, 2014, p. 213.