Previous Page  46 / 521 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 521 Next Page
Page Background

measures are foreseen against the dominant company’s illegal use of

domination with Article 202 TCC.

In cases where the dominant company causes its subsidiary to

incur losses, the dominant company shall be obliged to compensate

such losses. In the event that the determined compensation is not paid,

each shareholder of the subsidiary company may claim compensation

from the dominant company and from members of its board of direc-

tors. If the subsidiary company is not compensated, the shareholders

and creditors of the subsidiary company may file suit for the damages

incurred.

The illegality herein results from a transaction by the dominant

company, which damages the subsidiary company, its shareholders and

creditors.

The members of the subsidiary’s board of directors are obliged to

execute transactions as instructed by the dominant company even if

they would prefer not to do so. In such circumstances, members of the

subsidiary’s board of directors may conclude an agreement with the

dominant company in order to make the dominant company liable to

shareholders and creditors for any legal results.

Liability of the Subsidiary Company

In accordance with the domination agreement, the subsidiary’s

board of directors shall be responsible for complying with the domi-

nant company’s instructions; otherwise they may be held liable.

However, where the dominant company gives illegal instructions, the

managing body of the subsidiary company shall neither be held

responsible for nor obliged to exercise such instructions.

However, pursuant to Article 203 TCC, when the dominant com-

pany establishes full domination over the subsidiary company, which

means, when the dominant company directly or indirectly holds one

hundred percent of the shares and voting rights in the subsidiary com-

pany, the members of the dominant company’s board of directors may

give instructions to the subsidiary company with respect to its opera-

tions and management, even if such instructions cause the subsidiary

company to incur losses; under the condition that such instructions

stem from specific and concrete policies of the group of companies.

30

NEWSLETTER 2014