Previous Page  45 / 521 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 521 Next Page
Page Background

is concluded, the subsidiary company starts to act for the benefit of the

group of companies by changing its management structure.

The subsidiary company, no longer being managed by its own bod-

ies, is operated and controlled by another company and therefore

becomes dependent through a domination agreement, which must be

submitted for the approval of general assembly

4

.

Moreover, as is frequently observed in practice, the dominant com-

pany may be the shareholder of the subsidiary company as well. In

such cases, the shareholder dominant company is required to vote in

the subsidiary company’s general assembly. However, pursuant to

Article 436 TCC, the shareholder of a company cannot vote with

respect to personal acts and transactions between itself and the sub-

sidiary company under its dominance. Therefore, the dominant com-

pany that is the shareholder of the subsidiary company can only vote

on acts and transactions in which it holds no special interest.

Registration of Domination Agreements

As per Article 106/2 of the Regulation, in order to gain validity,

domination agreements must be approved by subsidiary company’s

general assembly; and then registered and announced. This registration

and announcement of the domination agreement enables third parties

to become aware of such agreement.

Domination agreements shall not be considered valid and effective

until registered and announced in the trade registry. However, the inva-

lidity of a domination agreement shall not prevent the liabilities and

responsibilities regulated under the provisions of the TCC and other

Codes. Therefore, as per Article 198/3 TCC, even if the domination

agreement is not registered and announced in the trade registry, the

dominant company and its managing body shall be held liable and

responsible.

Liability Arising from a Domination Agreement

Liability of the Dominant Company

The dominant company must not use its control illegally against

the subsidiary company through the domination agreement. Preventive

COMMERCIAL LAW

29

4

PULAŞLI, Hasan

, Yeni Şirketler Hukuk Genel Esaslar, Ankara 2012, p. 225.