Previous Page  338 / 521 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 338 / 521 Next Page
Page Background

sophical belief, religion and sect based distinctions, but it is not limit-

ed to them. In 5/2 numbered Article of the Labor Law, ‘

The employer

cannot make different agreements with full-time workers from part-

time workers or indefinite-term workers as opposed to fixed-term

workers unless there are employer-based reasons

.’ Therefore, no dis-

tinctions can be made between those workers who are subjected to dif-

ferent labor contracts with this provision. With the regulation in ques-

tion, the employer is obliged to exhibit equal treatment towards the

workers who are subjected to different labor contracts.

After this general regulation that is related to the prohibition of

discrimination, in the Article 12 of the Labor Law, ‘

Due to the dura-

tion of the contract, the employee who works with a fixed-term employ-

ment contract cannot be treated differently according to an equivalent

employee who works with a permanent employment contract, unless

there is a justifiable reason for discrimination. To an employee with a

fixed-term employment contract, payment and pecuniary divisible ben-

efits that are granted through a fixed time as a criterion are paid

according to the working time of the employee. While seeking seniori-

ty in the same workplace or enterprise in order to benefit from a work-

ing condition, the same seniority conditions imposed upon the employ-

ee with an indefinite-term employment contract will be given to the

employee with a fixed-term employment contract, unless there is a jus-

tifiable reason to implement different seniority. An equivalent employ-

ee is the employee who works in the same or similar job through an

indefinite-term employment contract. If such an employee does not

exist in that workplace, then an employee with an indefinite-term

employment contract who works in the same or similar job in the same

branch, in accordance with the conditions, will be taken into consider-

ation

.’

This provision states that no distinctions can be made between

employees with fixed or indefinite-term employment contracts. Two

notions are remarkable in this provision. The first one is the principle

of proportionality that relates to fees. This principle establishes equal

treatment between the employees by proportioning benefits related to

payment and pecuniary issues. Another remarkable issue in this article

is the equivalent employee notion. While determining equivalent

employees, if they exist, the Law primarily demands that an employee

322

NEWSLETTER 2014