Previous Page  189 / 516 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 189 / 516 Next Page
Page Background

European Commission (“Commission”) and made the dominant posi-

tion evaluation in accordance with the following criteria; the price and

life of the product in the primary market, the transparency of the prices

in the secondary market, the balance between the products’ price and

the principal product’s price in this market and the level of the costs in

the process of obtaining all this information

4

.

The Board, as a result of the examination it has conducted, deter-

mined that the low price difference between the Xerox branded print-

er and cartridge and the total cost of the toner cartridge proportionally

outweighs the cost of the printer. Furthermore, the Board also stated

that the cartridges’ prices are accessible and that the passage costs

between printers are not high. In the light of the foregoing, the Board

determined that it is possible to switch between different printers.

In conclusion, the Board set forth that the above-stated determina-

tions depict that Xerox cannot increase its prices in the secondary mar-

ket independently from the primary market and concluded that Xerox

is not in a dominant position in the relevant market.

Primary (Printer) Market.

The Board, in order to determine

whether Xerox is in dominant position or not, examined the breakdown

of the market shares held by competitor parties operating in the prima-

ry market and determined that 3-4 undertakings have higher market

shares than Xerox in the relevant market

5

.

Decision

The Board examined both the printer market corresponding to the

primary market and the ink/toner cartridges market (used in Xerox

branded printers) corresponding to the secondary market.

As a result of the examination, the Board determined that, despite

the integrated circuit implementation, cartridges may also be obtained

COMPETITION LAW

175

4

See § 85 – 86 of the Commission Report. These criteria are also stated in the decision dated

15.08.2008 and numbered 08-33/417-143 of the Board on printers branded Xerox. To consult

the decision, see the following link:

http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/Resources/GerekceliKurul

Kararlari/karar2433.pdf (accessed on: 18.01.2013).

5

The Board has already determined that Xerox was in dominant position in the primary (printer)

market in its decision dated 15.08.2008 and numbered 08-33/417-143. For detailed information,

see fn. 4.