Previous Page  183 / 516 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 183 / 516 Next Page
Page Background

position and examines the market shares of the Parties between the

years 2007 and 2010 in the HDD general market and in the markets for

mobile applications, desktop and corporate solutions. The Board, as a

result of the examination that it has conducted, decided that Seagate

will acquire an important market power within Turkey.

As it can be seen, the Board dos not clearly determine whether

Seagate will be in a dominant position or will strengthen its dominant

position after the acquisition. The Board has probably not made a clear

determination because the consequences of both assumptions are the

same. As a matter of fact, regardless of whether Seagate reaches a

dominant position or strengthens its dominant position after the trans-

action, the second test will apply. However, even if the consequences

are the same, it would have been better to make a clear determination

to ensure the clarity and definiteness in law.

Test of Significant Lessening of Competition

In order to determine whether the merger transaction will cause a

significant lessening of competition in the relevant market or not, the

Board takes into account various criteria.

Positive Effects to be Created in the Relevant Product Market

by the Transaction

As a result of interviews realized with undertakings, the Board

concluded that, except national computer producers, most of the under-

takings will not be negatively influenced by this transaction. Indeed,

even after the transaction, both Western Digital and Toshiba will con-

tinue to be important actors in the relevant product market. Moreover, the

facts that the final products of HDD constitute a low percentage of its

costs and that price differences between HDD producers are extremely

low, will reduce negative effects of the transaction on competition.

Negative Effects to be Created in the Relevant Product Market

by the Transaction

As a result of interviews realized with undertakings, the Board has

determined that the said transaction may reduce the negotiating power

in relation to the price and supply of computer producers which use

COMPETITION LAW

169