Previous Page  94 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 94 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

NEWSLETTER 2011

80

The liability herein only arises if the duty of care is not satisfied

properly. The duty of care criteria herein is the care that is pledged

on the board members of an independent company who are dedicated

to the company’s best interests and expected to act with the due care

and attention as a prudent executive under similar circumstances while

conducting such transaction. If it is established and proved that such care

is given, the board of members can avoid the liability.

It is determined that some articles within the provisions on legal

liability regarding the joint stock companies such as joint liability, statute

of limitations is applicable to the lawsuit to be filed by shareholders or

creditors through analogy.

In the case the dominant enterprise’s head office is located outside

Turkey; this lawsuit can be filed before the commercial court of the place

at which the subsidiary company’s head office is located.

Liability Arising out of Important Decisions

The second category, set forth in art. 202/2 of NCC, covers the

decisions which are taken by the general assembly of the subsidiary

company and in structural and important nature. The primary reason

for the unlawfulness herein is that these decisions are taken by use of

dominance power while there is no justifiable reason for the subsidiary

company which can be clearly understood.

3

2

Some sample decisions which are taken by use of dominance power

while there is no justifiable, reasonable ground and thus can lead to such

unlawfulness are also listed under art. 202/2 of NCC. Those are the

decisions such as merger, de-merger, change of type, termination, issuance

of securities and decisions regarding amendment of the important articles

of association.

In the cases of unlawfulness within the context of this paragraph,

the right of action against the dominant company is only granted to the

shareholders who votes against the decision and annotate their objections

to the minutes and who object to the decisions of the board of directors

2 

OKUTAN NILSSON

, s. 225.