Previous Page  59 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 59 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

COMMERCIAL LAW

45

voting at the GA. In order for this provision to be applied, the articles

of association shall contain a provision concerning the possibility of

holding the GA via electronic means. The alternative concerning the GA

via electronic means is an example for the effort of the New TCC with

regards to conforming to the technologic innovations. In this way, the

companies whose shareholders are not in the same physical environment

will be able to organize the GA meetings in a more efficient way.

The New TCC, which made a preference in favor of the attachment

of the voting right to the shareholder, adopted a different principle than

the TCC in this matter. The principle within the TCC with regards to

the voting right is its attachment to the share, and not to the shareholder.

Article 373/1 of the TCC regulates that each share certificate grants

at least one voting right. Additionally, the statement

“…the number of

voting rights granted by share certificates is determined by the articles

of association.”

in this article means that the voting right is attached to

the share itself. Unlike the TCC, the New TCC adopted a system, based

on the attachment of the voting right to the shareholder, and not to the

share. Article 434/2 of the New TCC includes the statement

“Even

though the shareholder holds only one share, he is entitled to at least one

voting right.”

With this provision, the shareholder is taken as basis in

the provisions concerning the voting right. This new rule is an important

exception to the rule which provides that the share is the key element of

the rights in joint stock companies.

Exercise of The Voting Right in Proportion to the Nominal Value

of the Share

Article 373/1 of the TCC states that

“Each share certificate grants

at least one voting right.”

Because of this statement, it can be asserted

that equal shares give equal rights to their holders, without taking into

consideration their nominal values. However, as each share may have a

different nominal value, it has been defended by the doctrine that voting

rights should be in proportion to the nominal value of the shares.

The New TCC, through Article 434, regulated that shareholders

would exercise their voting rights in proportion to the total nominal value

of the shares they hold. Therefore, the system in the TCC based on the