Previous Page  429 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 429 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS

415

Exemption Communiqué no 2002/2 on Vertical Agreements,

since Türkiye Garanti Bankası A.Ş. and Alternatifbank A.Ş.

were competing undertakings, that, as a result of the assessment

conducted within the framework of article 5 of the Act no 4054,

the relevant Agreement should be granted exemption as of its date

of signature of 23.12.2010 under the second paragraph of the same

article, since all of the conditions listed in first paragraph of the

aforementioned article were fulfilled. (03.08.2011, 11-44/991-

337)

• As a result of the examination conducted based on the claim that

Ak Sigorta A.Ş., Allianz Sigorta A.Ş., Anadolu Anonim Türk

Sigorta Şirketi, Axa Sigorta A.Ş., Eureko Sigorta A.Ş., Groupama

Sigorta A.Ş., Güneş Sigorta A.Ş. and Yapı Kredi Sigorta A.Ş.

violated the Act no 4054 with their practices related to the

provision of automobile insurance services for rental vehicles, the

Board decided that initiating an investigation was not necessary

under the Act no 4054 and the complaint should be rejected.

(03.08.2011, 11-44/993-339)

• As a result of the examination conducted based on the claim that

the recent procurements of liquid fuel products Fuel Oil No: 5 and

Fuel Oil No: 6 to be used in thermal power plants affiliated with

EÜAŞ (Electricity Generation Inc.) through reciprocal contracts

with TP Petrol Dağıtım A.Ş when this was previously done

through a tender system was in violation of the Act no 4054, the

Board decided that initiating an investigation was not necessary

under the Act no 4054 and the complaint should be rejected.

(03.08.2011, 11-44/960-313)

• As a result of the examination conducted based on the claim that

Arkas Group companies, operating in the ship brokerage business,

complicated the commercial operations of other undertakings, the

Board decided that no investigation was necessary under the Act

no 4054 and the complaint should be rejected. (03.08.2011, 11-

44/996-342)

• As a result of the examination conducted based on the claim that

Turkcell İletişim Hizmetleri A.Ş., Vodafone Telekomünikasyon