Previous Page  323 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 323 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

LAW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

309

In the event that the substance or legality of awards pronounced by the

arbitrators is examined by the enforcement judge, the preference of the

parties as per the choice of arbitration as a dispute resolution process will

be ignored.

Within this framework, the fees to be collected with regards to

enforcement lawsuits shall be handled in light of our explanations above.

Relevant Provisions of the Act of Fees (Court Fees)

Fees to be charged with regards to enforcement of foreign arbitral

awards are regulated under Article 3 of the Act of Fees. Pursuant to the

first paragraph of the relevant article, a judgment and writ fee shall be

charged in accordance with the nature of the award. Pursuant to the second

paragraph of the relevant article, it is regulated that the same principle

shall apply to fees with regards to arbitral awards and disputes that are

compulsory to be settled by arbitration.

Judgment and writ fees are regulated under the Tariff No.1 attached

to the Act of Fees. Pursuant to title III/1 of the relevant tariff which

regulates proportional fees, in the event that

“a decision is taken with

regards to the lawsuits, a subject matter of which is a disputed sum”

, a

proportional fee of 59.4 per mille shall be charged over the sum which

is subject to the dispute. The fixed fee is regulated under the title III/2 of

the Tariff No.1. Pursuant to the relevant disposition, a fixed fee shall be

charged for all cases except where it is indicated that the case is subject

to a proportional fee.

As we mentioned above, Tariff No.1 clearly regulates that, in the

event that

“a decision is taken with regards to the lawsuits, subject matter

of which is a disputed sum in between parties”

, a proportional fee shall

be charged. On the other hand, in enforcement lawsuits, there is not

any decision taken with regards to the substance of the dispute, and the

examination merely includes whether the conditions of enforcement are

met or there exists any enforcement obstacles.

Moreover, in UYAP system, there is a common practice concerning

the collection of fixed fees with regards to enforcement lawsuits, and the

fee is calculated as a fixed fee by the court clerkship, and the treasury

cash desk collects a fixed fee.