LAW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
293
Another notion to be differed from joinder of actions is “competition
of claims”. The competition of claims has the meaning to have several
legal grounds to allege one claim. So that, the competition of claims is
based on only one claim, which can be alleged on more than one legal
ground while the joinder of actions is based on occurrence of several cause
of actions that lead to make more than one claim within one sole action.
In fact, for the competition of claims, the competition is not between the
claims but between the legal grounds
2
.
(ii) Non-existence of a relation between the claims as to be principal
or accessory
The second condition for joinder of actions is non-existence of a
relation between the claims as to be principal or accessory. This condition
emphasizes the difference between joinder of actions and actions with
alternative pleadings since the latter requires existence of a claim
alternative to principal claim for the cases where the principal claim is not
accepted. Accordingly, for existence of joinder of actions it is necessary
that there is no order of priority between the claims, an order as being the
principal and accessory claim.
(iii) The claims need to be considered within the same type of
jurisdiction
For joinder of actions, the claims need to be considered within the
same type of jurisdiction. However, there is no explanation neither in the
article nor the justification regarding what to be understood with “type
of jurisdiction”. The term “type of jurisdiction” is defined in the doctrine
as “holding the transactions forming an entity subject to a different
judgment procedure”
3
. Departing from this definition, the different types
of jurisdiction are classified as Constitutional Jurisdiction, Administrative
Jurisdiction and Civil and Penal Jurisdiction
4
. As seen, the types of
jurisdiction are accepted as judicial remedies. In this case, it should
2
ALANGOYA, H. Yavuz/ YILDIRIM, M. Kamil/DEREN – YILDIRIM, Nevhis
, Medeni
Usul Hukuku Esasları, İstanbul 2011, s. 129.
3
KURU, Baki / ARSLAN, Ramazan/ YILMAZ, Ejder
, Medeni Usul Hukuku, Ders Kitabı,
Ankara, 2011, s. 58.
4
KURU/ARSLAN/YILMAZ
, s, 58 vd.
PEKCANITEZ, Hakan / ATALAY, Oğuz /
ÖZEKES, Muhammed
, Medeni usul Hukuku, İstanbul 2011, s.73 vd.