Previous Page  305 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 305 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

LAW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

291

Joinder of Actions (CPC art. 110)

5

*

Att. Fatih Işık

Introduction

Even the claims, cause of actions, of a claimant party are, in general,

intended to seek a sole result to enforce, it is also possible to seek relief

through several claims intended to pursue more than one redress. By

means of such course of action, the claims are consolidated. The joinder

of the claims exists in case there are more than one claims alleged in a

cumulative manner.

The joinder of actions was being exercised even during the period of

Civil Procedure Code numbered 1086, despite the fact that the institution

had not been explicitly regulated. It has been exercised in accordance

with art. 3 of the Civil Procedure Code stating that the competence of the

courts to decide in particular controversy shall be determined according

to total amounts of the claims that are subject matter of the actions, in

case several relieves are sought with a single action. Therefore, it was

possible to allege several claims in one sole action. The Civil Procedure

Code numbered 6100 (“CPC”) which entered into force on 01.10.2011

has explicitly regulated the institution in art. 110 entitled as “Joinder of

Actions”. The article is as follows:

“The claimant may allege several primary independent claims

against the same defendant on the same petition for action. This

is possible only if all the alleged claims are considered within the

same type of court, which have jurisdiction over the venue for

each claims. ”

In case of joinder of actions, there is several accrued cause of actions

to seek remedy with one sole action. It is possible that the court may

accept all of the claims or to dismiss all of them; or may decide to accept

one of the claims and dismiss the others. Accordingly, there are several

results that the claimant intends to reach.

The purpose of the joinder of actions is to realize the economy

in procedural transactions during a lawsuit and to thwart the risk of

*

Article of December 2011