Previous Page  187 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 187 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

COMPETITION LAW

173

Allowing Competition to the Extent that is Necessary for Achieving

the Aims Mentioned Herein Above

As envisaged in Art. 5 of the Competition Act, it is required that in

order to achieve the aims and meet the set targets, the competition should

not be restricted more than necessary.

The fundamental aims of the alliance in subject of the notification are

(i) to decrease the service prices by providing cost efficiencies through

economics of scope and concentration that would be achieved with the

alliance, and (ii) to deliver services with quality by means of the synergy

and effective information transmission between the parties.

In an attempt to examine these aims, we may ascertain that both

measures are highly likely to increase the preference of consumers to

select the service of member airline companies. At this point, the Board

evaluated that if there are less restrictive ways to achieve these aims.

The main issues, which have restrictive elements, in this case are the

coordination of tariffs and capacity between the parties, the coordination

of price arrangement and income management and the coordination of

frequent flyer programs.

The Board decided that the competition is not restricted more than

necessary, taking into consideration that the above-mentioned issues have

outcomes for the benefit of the consumers.

Conclusion and Evaluations

The Board decided to grant individual exemption to the agreements

subject to notification.

To this end by taken into consideration the recent investigations and

sectoral examinations, it would be acknowledged that the aviation sector

is one of the sectors under the scrutiny of the Board that is focused on

meticulously, for the sake of protection of competition. Alliance in subject

is achieved by global and intercontinental factors in the relevant market.

From this point of view, it is vitally important for the maintenance and

protection of the competition in the aviation market in general. Thus, the

decision of the Board in this case is notable.