Previous Page  189 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 189 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

COMPETITION LAW

175

Similar actions were taken at the premises of undertakings active in the

cement and related products market in Spain on September 22-23, 2009.

Precedent Commission Practice of Cement Market

The cement market has always been one of the sectorsmost scrutinized

by the Commission. For instance, the Commission, in its decisions of

1994 decided to fine the European Cement Association (Cembureau),

8 national cement associations, and 33 European cement producers for

violation of Article 85 (new article 101) of the EC Treaty, including

their participation in a general market sharing agreement, transnational

restrictive practices, and restrictive practices relating to exportation.

The conclusion of long inspections and investigations carried out

by the Commission is the observation that a number of large European

manufacturers monitored exports and export forecasts, compared supply

and demand on internal and export markets, and exchanged information

on prices by means of the information and coordination bodies that they

set up, such as the European Cement Export Committee (ECEC) and the

European Export Policy Committee (EPC). These companies also entered

into restrictive practices in relation to white cement exporters. In fact, the

Commission pronounced a total fine of 248 million ECU

4

3

.

The national competition authorities of Member States, such as

the Turkish Competition Board, have executed several competition

investigations concerning this sector

5

4

.

3 

The European Currency Unit was a basket of the currencies of the European Community

member states, used as the unit of account of the Community before being replaced by the

EURO on January 1, 1999, at parity.

4 

The German and Polish competition authorities fined cartel agreements in the cement market

in 2003 and 2009, respectively. The French Competition Authority fined anti-competitive

practices in the said market in 2007. The Turkish Competition Board fined similar practices

by Turkish cement producers in 2005 (Decision numbered 05-05/42-17 and dated January

13, 2005), 2004 (Decision numbered 04-77/1109-278 and dated December 2, 2004) and 2002

(Decision numbered 02-06/51-24 and dated February 1, 2002) respectively. The Turkish

Competition Authority recently opened an investigation against 10 cement producers active

in the eastern part of the Turkish Republic, namely Kars Çimento, Aşkale Çimento, Yurt

Çimento, Limak Çimento, Elazığ Altınova Çimento, Çimko Çimento, Çimsa Çimento, Adana

Çimento, KÇS Kahramanmaraş Çimento and Mardin Çimento.