Previous Page  97 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 97 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

COMP ET I T I ON LAW

83

Commitments in Merger Transactions under Turkish

Competition Law

*

Commitments are the remedies offered by the parties in order to

overcome any competition concerns arising out of a merger transaction.

For a long time, the Competition Board (hereinafter referred to as

the “CB”) has authorized the operation of concentrations normally not

acceptable under competition rules, subject to certain conditions that it

has imposed on the parties. More recently, its practice has changed to

the granting of merger clearances within the framework of commitments

proposed by the parties despite the absence of any special provision in the

competition legislation addressing this practice.

Legal Basis

Commitments are not expressly regulated by the Act on the Protection

of Competition No. 4054 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). The

only article referring to this system is Article 6 (3) of Communiqué No.

1997/1 on Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the

Competition Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Communiqué”).

Types of Commitments

Although the CB gives place to both structural and behavioral

commitments within its decisions, it principally opts for structural remedies

as in European Competition Law. The Commission notice on remedies

acceptable under Council Regulation states that structural remedies are

preferred to behavioral remedies because they do not require medium or

long-term monitoring measures

1

. In line with this practice, two types of

structural remedies can especially be observed in the CB’s decisions:

*

Article of January 2010 – Prof. Dr. H. Ercüment Erdem

1 OJEU, 2008/C – 267/01.