Previous Page  93 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 93 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

COMMERC I AL LAW

79

effect of assignment of a claim on the pledge. The dominant opinion in

doctrine accepts that this limitation is only for the moment of constitution

of the pledge. Consequently, the transfer of a claim secured with a pledge

has no effect on the pledge. The other opinion in the doctrine, considering

that the pledge on a commercial enterprise can be extended contrary to its

ratio legis

in case of a free transfer of a pledge right, stipulates that the claim

may be transferred, but in this case, the right of pledge is terminated. In our

opinion, the legal requirement is satisfied once the agreement is concluded

among the parties stipulated by the law. Since the pledge is an accessory

right to the principal claim, the pledge on a commercial enterprise can be

transferred to the extent that the principal claim may be transferred.

Use of foreign currency for pledge.

In creating a pledge, it is required

that the amount of the claim must be stated in Turkish Liras in the pledge

agreement. Because of this requirement, it is also unclear whether foreign

currency may be used for a pledge. Despite the different opinions, we

opine that Art. 851/II of the Civil Code should be applied by reference of

Art. 20 of LPCE and that, in case of satisfaction of the requirements in this

article, the use of foreign currency for a pledge is possible.

Conclusion

As seen above, pledges on commercial enterprise are created to satisfy

the financing needs of merchants and craftsmen. However, the negligence

and carelessness in the regulation of legal principles cause many

controversial issues. Correction of the wording and the deficiencies in

relevant provisions and having new provisions clarifying the controversial

issues would ensure smooth functioning of the procedure.