Previous Page  100 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 100 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0

86

Complete commitments:

Commitments must include all factors,

such as a suitable purchaser or the assets to be divested in order to

eliminate competition concerns

14

.

Ad hoc

commitments:

In order to reach the expected goal and

eliminate all competition concerns in the relevant market, all

commitments must be determined in accordance with the case at

hand. The CB, in some decisions, fully accepts the Commission’s

decisions without making further analyses

15

.

Implementation of Commitments

The implementation phase is the most important phase because it

permits the merger clearance to be put into practice.

Implementing factors

:

The correct implementation of the

commitments is to be ensured through determinant factors, such

as trustees to monitor the implementation or time limits which

guarantee the implementation within a relatively short time period.

Absence of implementing factors

:

The absence of implementing

factors in the CB’s decisions may cause a failure to eliminate

competition concerns by reason of imperfect implementation

16

. For

instance, some of the CB’s decisions do not include the nomination

of a trustee in order to monitor the correct implementation of the

commitments.

Sanctions in case of Imperfect Implementation of Commitments

In order to fill the gap in the competition legislation, the CB, on the

basis of Article 4 of the Act, generally decides to launch an

ex officio

investigation if the commitments are not correctly implemented

17

.

14 The CB does not include all factors in its decisions. For instance, the Glaxo Wellcome / Smith-

Kline decision (fn. 5) does not include any reference to a suitable purchaser.

15 Decision DSM N.V – Roche Holding AG (fn. 2) and decision Syngenta Crop Protecton AG –

Astazenece Holdings B.V – Koninklijke Venderhave Groep B.V (fn. 3)

16 Decision Toros Tarım / Sümer Holding (fn. 10); decision Deutsche Lufthansa AG – Condor

Flugdienst GmbH (fn. 3) and decision TÜPRAŞ (fn. 13)

17 Decision Metro / Migros (fn. 11); decision Glaxo Wellcome / SmithKline (fn. 5) and decision

Bankar / Fiba Bank,18.09.

2001, 01-44/433-111