data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/558d2/558d2a6363a3dd82148f6ae1c047478a6b6f9406" alt="Show Menu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66752/66752f0c2bbc4cee4706463b40f518560816d871" alt="Page Background"
NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0
72
be more appropriate and suitable for legal security if the matter were
regulated by an act. As a conclusion, the legal gap formed because of the
cancellation of article 3/d of DFIA should have been filled by an act of law,
rather than a Regulation, in terms of legislative technique.