Security Requirement Envisaged for Tax Refund Cases in order to Claim Suspension of Execution
Introduction
Through the promulgation of the Law No. 7351, published in the Official Gazette dated 22.01.2022 and no. 31727, essential amendments are introduced to Turkish tax legislation. Apart from the tax amendments, a new provision has been added to Article 27 of the Administrative Jurisdiction Procedure Law no. 2577 (“AJPL”) titled as “Stay of Execution”. According to the newly added provision to the AJPL, taxpayers must deposit 50% of the actual tax amount in dispute as security in order to claim a stay of execution decisions during the tax cases initiated with the refund claim of the paid taxes. The above-mentioned security requirement should be analyzed in terms of the stay of execution institution envisaged for tax litigation procedure and constitutional rights.
Suspension of Execution Regime in terms of Tax Litigation Procedure
As per Article 27/1 of AJPL, initiation of a lawsuit at the Council of State or the administrative courts shall not prevent the execution of the administrative procedure in dispute. The Council of State or the administrative courts may decide to suspend the execution by showing justification if (i) the implementation of the administrative procedure both results in damage that are hard to recover or impossible to recover and (ii) the administrative procedure is expressly in contradiction to the law. According to Article 27/6 of AJPL, the stay of execution order shall be given after a financial guarantee is deposited. However, deposit of financial guarantee might not be sought, according to the requirements of the situation. This is the general rule for the “suspension of execution” in administrative jurisdiction.
On the other, Article 27/4 of AJPL stipulates an exemption of the above-mentioned general rule in terms of tax litigation cases. According to the referred provision, filing a tax lawsuit arising from tax disputes at the tax courts shall suspend the collection procedures of the part of the levied taxes, duties, charges and similar financial liabilities and the increases and penalties thereof which is the subject of the case.
However, as per the same Article 27/4 of AJPL, taxpayers shall claim a suspension of execution decision during the tax cases where (i) taxpayer submit their tax declaration with reservation and (ii) file a tax lawsuit with the refund claim of the excessively paid taxes within the scope of the referred tax declaration. In these cases, the general rule stipulated under Article 27/2 will be applied.[1]
Amendments Introduced Through the Law no. 7351
Through the promulgation of the Law no. 7351, a new provision has been added to Article 27/4 of the AJPL. According to the newly added provision, taxpayers must deposit 50% of the actual tax amount in dispute as security in order to claim a stay of execution decisions during the tax cases initiated with the refund claim of the paid taxes.
According to the preamble the Law No. 7351, the aim of the law is to prevent unfair refunds in tax lawsuits and any potential Treasury Loss. The Preamble states that in cases where a suspension of execution is decided by the court, if the court decides that the refund is unfair after the examination on the merits, there may be problems in the recovery of the refunded amounts due to reasons such as the destruction of the taxpayer's assets.
Therefore, from now onward, taxpayers must deposit 50% of the actual tax amount in dispute as security in order to claim a stay of execution decisions during the tax cases initiated with the refund claim of the taxes paid upon the tax declarations submitted with reservation.
Analysis Requirement Regarding the Security Obligation in terms of the Constitutional Rights
The principle of the rule of law requires the activities of the administration to be subject to judicial review in terms of their lawfulness. Therefore, the realization of this principle depends on the effective implementation of administrative judicial review.
Additionally, the principle of proportionality constitutes a sub-principle of the rule of law. Pursuant to the said principle, fundamental rights and freedoms can only be restricted under the conditions specified in Article 13 and 15 of Turkish Constitution and as long as the restriction is “proportionate”.[2] Therefore, it is disputable whether the security requirement introduced by the Law no. 7351 and amounting to 50% of the tax amount in dispute is "proportionate" and “lawful” in this sense.
Moreover, as per Article 36 of the Turkish Constitution, everyone has the right to a "fair trial" by claiming and defending as plaintiff or defendant before the judicial authorities by making use of legitimate methods and means. It is foreseen that stipulating such a high amount of security in tax refund cases will deter taxpayers from filing a lawsuit. In this sense, the regulation in question should be also discussed in terms of the “right for a fair trial”.
Finally, Article 35 of Turkish Constitution regulates that the right to property may be restricted only by Law and in conformity with the public interest. Therefore, any restriction on the right to property must also be proportionate as per the rule of law summarized above. In this context, it should also be evaluated whether the security obligation introduced by the Law No. 7351, which will essentially decrease the taxpayer's assets, infringes the essence of the right to property.
Conclusion
Through the amendment introduced by the Law no. 7351, taxpayers must deposit 50% of the actual tax amount in dispute as security in order to claim a stay of execution decisions during the tax cases initiated with the refund claim. This newly introduced security requirement would be very crucial for the cases initiated with the refund claim of the taxes excessively paid upon the submission of the relevant tax declarations with reservation.
We believe that the new security requirement is legally “discussable” in terms of the rule of law & proportionality principles. Therefore, hesitations occur on the fact whether this new security requirement breaches or not the proprietary right & the right to a fair trail regulated within the scope of the Constitution and European Convention on Human Rights.
- Canyaş, Oytun: Vergi Yargılaması Hukukunda Yürütmeninin Durdurulması Kurumunun Genel Niteliği, Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, Ağustos 2010, Sayı: 263
- Balcı, Mustafa: Teminat İsteme ve İhtiyati Haciz Uygulamalarında Yaşanan Hukuki Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri, İstanbul, Ocak 2021, sy: 291
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
Law No. 7456 on Additional Motor Vehicle Tax for Compensation of Economic Losses Caused by the Earthquake on 6/2/2023 and on Amendments to Certain Laws and Decree-Law No. 375 (“Law No. 7456”) was published in the Official Gazette dated 15.07.2023 and No. 32249. Law No. 7456 introduced significant...
In order to determine the procedures and principles regarding the implementation of certain articles of the Misdemeanor Law No. 5326 (“Law”), which is the general procedural law for administrative fines, the Ministry of Treasury and Finance (“Revenue Administration”) has published the General...
Through Article 20 of Law No. 7440 on Restructuring of Certain Receivables and Amending Certain Laws (“Law No. 7440”), published in the Official Gazette dated 12 March 2023 and No. 32130, significant and new tax regulations regarding debt push down financing structure for merger transactions are introduced...
Provisional Article 32 was added to Banking Law numbered 5411 (“BL”) through Article 17 of the Law No. 7186 on Amendments to the Income Tax Law and Certain Laws ("Law No. 7186") in the Official Gazette on 19.07.2019. This law enables companies that are experiencing financial difficulties, but which are...
Law No. 7420 on the Amendment of Income Tax Law and Certain Laws and Decrees (“Law No. 7420“) which was published in the Official Gazette dated 09.11.2022 introduced important amendments and regulations in the tax legislation. The addition of Article 32/B, entitled "Taxation in Capital Decrease" to...
Free Zones are zones that are established to promote export-oriented investment and production, accelerate foreign direct investment and technology access, direct enterprises towards export, and develop international trade. There are many tax advantages provided to taxpayers operating in...
Through the promulgation of Law No. 7394 on the Amendments of Treasury-Owned Immovable Property Valuation and the Value Added Tax Law and on the Amendments of Certain Other Laws and Decrees, published in the Official Gazette dated 15 April 2022 and No. 31810, significant amendments...
In recent years, many new business models have emerged and traditional business models have changed greatly, within the increasing digitalization in the economy. Along with said change, challenges arose for taxing the international business income of...
Social media has emerged with the development of the digital world and internet technology and has greatly influenced the world today. One of the main categories of actors in social media is social media content producers. These people earn through social networks in...
The 1990’s hold significant importance by means of the developments that took place in the global economy. During the transition to the second half of the 1900’s, the Federal Reserve increased interest rates, and the hot money flow changed its direction from East Asian countries to the West...