Previous Page  347 / 522 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 347 / 522 Next Page
Page Background

the reasons why experts appointed by the court are required to com-

ment on the acceptability of the assets as capital in kind.

It is also important to note that in order for contribution of intel-

lectual property rights to be considered as capital in kind, it is manda-

tory that they are already registered. Even if an intellectual property

right is protected,

e.g.

in accordance with unfair competition regula-

tions, it cannot be contributed as capital in kind if it is not registered

5

.

Valuation

Valuation is an important step of contributions in kind, since the

monetary value of the contribution in Turkish Liras must be stated in

the articles of association of the subject company.

An expert appointed by the commercial court of first instance

located in the district of the company headquarters is the competent

authority to determine the monetary value of the contribution in kind.

This regulation is an extension of the principle of maintenance of cap-

ital, as it provides safety with respect to the monetary value of the con-

tributed capital

6

. The value determined by the expert must be exactly

stated under the articles of association of the subject company.

In the expert’s valuation report, it must be stated that the applica-

ble valuation method is the fairest and the most appropriate choice for

everyone, and that the reality, validity and conformity with Article 342

of the TCC of the receivables to be contributed in cash have been deter-

mined. The report must further specify the collectability and the exact

value of the subject assets, the amount of shares that should be allo-

cated for each asset that is contributed in kind, and its equivalent in

Turkish Liras. The report must be based on satisfactory grounds and

conform to the principle of accountability. Founders and beneficiaries

are entitled to object to the report.

Valuation of intellectual property rights is complex and unique in

each case. Over the past few years, this has become an area of increas-

ing interest to related experts. The European Commission formed an

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

331

5

Tekinalp

, p. 157.

6

Preamble of Article 343 of the TCC.