Previous Page  336 / 522 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 336 / 522 Next Page
Page Background

acceptance is possible, as well. It should be emphasized that until this

stage, these processes are fulfilled by trademark representatives on

behalf of the right holders.

Action of Nullity of the REB’s Decision

The applicant, or the person who objects to the application, may

initiate an action of nullity in response to the decision of the REB with-

in 2 months, with the Ankara Civil Courts for Intellectual and

Industrial Property Rights (“CCIIPR”). This action does not automati-

cally prevent the usage of the rights that have arisen from the registra-

tion. Therefore, the claimant shall request a cautionary judgment to

halt the usage of the trademark and the rights that have arisen from this

action.

In this action, the defendant is the TPI. Aside from the TPI, in

accordance with the situation at hand, the applicant, or the person/s

who object/s to the application may be the defendant, as well. The

CCIIPR shall accept, reject, or partially accept or reject the case. An

appeal with the Court of Cassation is possible in connection with this

decision.

The CCIIPR is not entitled to register or cancel the trademark.

Therefore, the claimant shall execute the decision after it becomes

absolute. For example, in the event that the trademark is registered

wrongfully at the end of the proceeding, the claimant shall initiate the

below-mentioned action of invalidity to cancel the trademark.

Action of Invalidity

This case aims to withdraw the trademarks that are registered

wrongfully, and/or whose protections lose their grounds because of

various events that occur after the registry. Invalidity reasons are count-

ed conclusively under Article 42 of the Decree- Law. However, in

accordance with the established case law

2

, registrations that are made

in bad faith became a reason for invalidity. Nevertheless, the Court of

Cassation provides contradictory decisions, as well.

320

NEWSLETTER 2015

2

Decision of the Assembly of Civil Chambers of the Court of Cassation, dated 16.07.2008 and

numbered 2008/11-501 E. 2008/507 K. may be given as an example in the relevant matter.